sign up I login
 advanced
refer a friend - earn nickels!!
biki   biki is offline biki's messages in the community
Message
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Magnetism -> Explanation of the domain theory of magnetism -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
read HCV
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Physical Chemistry -> Why an ideal gas cannot be liquified? -> Go to message
This Post 4 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
because it is an ideal gas... thats the answer..

as it is an ideal gas.. there will be 0 inter-molecular force of attraction at any temp. or pressure..

So it cannot be liquefied
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Course Material -> where can i download physics ncert in one go ? -> Go to message
This Post 5 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
www.iit-dreams.blogspot.com
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Organic Chemistry -> Carbenes -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
7 replies   

FORGET ELECTROPHILICITY...







TELL ME WHICH ONE IS MORE ELECTRON DEFICIENT...???



(forget my first questn)


JUST TELL ME WHICH ONE IS MORE ELECTRON DEFICIENT !!!

Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Organic Chemistry -> how to make best use of morrinson n boyd ...book? -> Go to message
This Post 2 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
2 replies   
use morrison and boyd for reference..

have any problm in understanding.. go to m & b index at the end of the book.. find out the term.. and browse into that page directly..

Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Organic Chemistry -> Carbenes -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
7 replies   
WHICH IS MORE ELECTRON DEFICIENT - Singlet or Triplet Carbene ??

plzz answer
Community shelf Community shelf -> Centripetal and Centrifugal Forces_REVISITED -> Go to message
This Post 5 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
0 replies   

DEFINITIONS :-


1) Centripetal Force :- a center-seeking force that causes an object to move in a circular path.


For example, suppose a ball is tied to a string and swung around in a circle at a constant velocity. The ball moves in a circular path because the string applies a centripetal force to the ball. According to Sir Isaac Newton's first law of motion, a moving object will travel in a straight path unless acted on by a force. So, if the string were suddenly cut, the ball would no longer be subject to the centripetal force and would travel in a straight line in a direction tangent to the circular path of the ball (if not for the force of gravity).


As another example, suppose a person is riding on a merry-go-round. As the merry-go-round rotates, the person must hang onto the ride to keep from falling off. Where the person grasps the ride, a centripetal force is applied to the individual that keeps the person moving in a circular path. If the person were to let go, he or she would travel in a straight line (if gravity were absent).


In general, the centripetal force that needs to be applied to an object of mass m that is traveling in a circular path of radius r at a constant velocity v is mv2/r.


 Centripetal Force


When a ball is whirled in a circle, it is accelerating inward. This inward acceleration is caused by a centripetal, or center-seeking, force supplied by the tension in the string. The required force is equal to mv2/r, where m is the mass of the ball, v is its velocity (speed and direction), and r is its distance from the center of revolution. 


 


2) Centrifugal Force:- An apparent force that seems to pull a rotating or spinning object away from the centre. Its existence depends upon the frame of reference. As it is a pseudo force, obviously it comes into play only when the viewer is in a non - inertial frame.


 


THE MISCONCEPT :-


Often, centripetal force is confused with centrifugal force. While centripetal force is a real force,—that is, the force is due to the influence of some object or fieldcentrifugal force is a fictitious force.


A fictitious force is present only when a system is examined from an accelerating frame of reference. If the same system is examined from a non-accelerating frame of reference, all the fictitious forces disappear.


For example, a person ( viewer himself ) on a rotating merry-go-round would experience a centrifugal force that pulls away from the center of the ride. The person experiences this force only because he or she is on the rotating merry-go-round, which is an accelerating frame of reference. If the same system is analyzed from the sidewalk next to the merry-go-round, which is a non-accelerating frame of reference, there is no centrifugal force. The individual on the sidewalk would only note the centripetal force that keeps the individual moving in a circular path. In general, real forces are present regardless of whether the reference frame used is accelerating or not accelerating; fictitious forces are present only in an accelerating frame of reference.




 


THE WRONG ASSUMPTION :-

Now what some people do is that, they say the body remains in its place while going in circular motion because c.p. force and c.f. force cancel each other. 


Thats not right !!! C.p. force is not a new type of force acting on the body undergoing circular motion. When a body undergoes circular motion, a force ( one among the four forces of nature, e.g. gravitational, electrostatic, magnetic etc, etc ) always acts on the body perpendicular to its motion.


That force has a magnitude of its own (according to the law which defines that force) and that magnitude is just equal to mv2/r. Thats it.


But when anyone observes the circular motion from any non-inertial frame,


the accl^n of the body w.r.t that frame = {vct(F) - vct(f)} / m.


where vct(f) = pseudo force = centrifugal force = m x accln of. the non inertial frame of reference.


and vct(F) = force acting on the body as seen from inertial frame = m x accln w.r.t inertial frame = force which causes circular motion ( Force perp. to velocity) which acts as c.p. force ( = mv2/r) in case of inertial frame.


Now if accln of the body w.r.t the non - inertial frame = 0


then, vct(F) = vct(f)


=> magnitude of Force causing circular motion  = magnitude of c.f. force.


this is the case when the body appears to be at rest..


 


NOTE:- here we are not writing the force causing circular motion as c.p. force, as we will not be observing the body to go in a circle (which is possible only if we are observing the motion from an inertial frame).


So c.p. force and c.f. force can never act together on a body.


 


picture source - google image search

Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> why is potential energy related to conservative force ? -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
why or how..??

if how, then change in P.E. = - (work done by Conservative Force)

if why, then i dont know !! i think its the def^n. Thats what is written in HCV
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> It is well known that force is a vector qty and pressure is force per unit area. Then why -> Go to message
This Post 2 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
6 replies   
Pressure doesnot follow laws of vector addition. So it is not a vector.
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> please explain me the concept of constraint equations in mechanics. -> Go to message
This Post 2 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
1 replies   
taking into advantage the certain limitations seen in a system related to the motion of the constituents of the system, and hence writing equations gives us the constraint equations.. !!

Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Organic Chemistry -> Carbenes -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
7 replies   
my frn, you wrote - "In a singlet carbene There is one orbital vacant and one empty".. i think u hav mistaken there.. vacant and empty have the same meaning..

and ya !!!
i asked which one is more electron deficient ??

free radicals are also electron deficient !!!

So please review the questn - WHICH IS MORE ELECTRON DEFICIENT - Singlet or Triplet Carbene ??
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Organic Chemistry -> Carbenes -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
7 replies   

which one is more electron deficient ( more electrophilic in nature ) ??


Singlet Carbene or Triplet Carbene ??


AND YES PLEASE GIVE THE REASON ..

Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Organic Chemistry -> rearrangements, shifts etc etc -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
14 replies   
thank u all 4 ur help
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Organic Chemistry -> rearrangements, shifts etc etc -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
14 replies   
@madhusudan.chavan sir,
thank you sir, for ur answer.

sir, what about ( -H ) ?

where does -H find its place in the general series among -H, -R, -Ar groups ?

In the book by SN Sanyal, it is given that -H > -Ar > -R is the general migratory aptitude. Is it right ?
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Organic Chemistry -> rearrangements, shifts etc etc -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
14 replies   
nishant13940.. plzz tel which one is correct..

i m really confused
 
 
Go to:   

Top Offers for goIITians
Correspondence Courses
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Classroom/Crash Courses
Narayana - Kota , Delhi , Others
Brilliant Tutorials - Class , Crash
Aakash Institute - Medical , Engg
Online Test Series
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Mahesh Tutorials
AMITY      Sri Chaitanya