sign up I login
 advanced
refer a friend - earn nickels!!
sinjan.j   sinjan.j is offline sinjan.j's messages in the community
Message
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Algebra -> Determinants q 1 -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
2 replies   


Lets call the above DETERMINANT D.


D =0


one of the roots of D is x= -9.


 


find the other roots.


====================


Guys,


after solving the determinant I get,


x3 - 67x -126 = 0


 


After this I dont know how to proceed..!! PLZ help


 


 


 

Catalogs Discussion Forums -> General -> plzzz tell me which is the best book for chemistry for.iit. -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
5 replies   
Physical --> sit and do P bahadur properly.. followed by NCERT
inorganic --> NCERT
organic --> NCERT , then arihant(contains errors.. be careful)

A teacher wud make your job easy
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Physical Chemistry -> quantum theory -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
8 replies   
akumar_ak's answer is the best
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Integral Calculus -> Really urgent..!!! -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
3 replies   

Problem:

(tdt)/(4-t^4)^(1/2)

Attempt:

I want the derivate of whatever i make u equal to, to equal something outside of u therefore I will factorize the denominator to equal -(-2+t^2)(2+t^2) and make u equal to (2+t^2) so that du=2tdt

Balance the equation so that one side is equal to the numerator

(1/2)du=tdt

Now I have

1/2Click to see the LaTeX code for this image = 1/(-(-2+t^2)u)^1/2

How do I apply this elementary integral in this situation?:

Click to see the LaTeX code for this image 1/(a^2-x^2)^1/2 dx = sin^-1(x/a) + C

I don't know what to do with the u in

1/(-(-2+t^2)u)^1/2



If it helps the final answer is supposed to be:

(1/2)sin^-1(t^2/2)

Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Trignometry -> Prove that -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
2 replies   
someone plz answer
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Trignometry -> Prove that -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
2 replies   


 


prove the above

Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Trignometry -> Prove that -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
1 replies   


 


 


 


prove the above

Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Physical Chemistry -> Question on 'Atomic Structure' -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
6 replies   
edison is absolutely right..!!

dont forget quantization principle.. its important
Community shelf Community shelf -> GREAT CREATIVITY!!! -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
2 replies   
dude I think u copied and pasted from a mail u received.. we wont be able to see the pic in that case
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> circular tract.. simple doubt -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
someone answer plzz
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> circular tract.. simple doubt -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
3 replies   

Two runners start simultaneously from the same point on a

circular 200-m track and run in same directions. One runs at a

constant speed of 6.20 m/s, and the other runs at a constant speed

of 5.50 m/s.



when will the fast one overtake the slower one?



----------------------------------------------------------------------

this may be an easy problem, but I am getting confused... as far as I have analyzed.. the distance traveled for overtaking is same and the time taken for overtaking is different....



If this is the correct analysis.. then I am not able to proceed further... can yiu help me to proceed??



Thanxx..!!!

Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Inorganic Chemistry -> coordination compounds -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
The general method to distinguish between them is

Fe WITH NO

ONLy
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Analytical Geometry -> Eqn of Locus calculation -> Go to message
This Post 5 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
7 replies   
the above soln is a good solution
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Inorganic Chemistry -> coordination compounds -> Go to message
This Post 7 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
3 replies   

See Wat happens is that Fe$O4 Combines with NO gas in "Brown Ring test"



forming [Fe(H2O)5NO]SO4



Fe+2(3d6).....four unpaired electrons

With NO(nitrosyl)



thereafter "Charge transfer" takes place

NO transfers its one unpaired electron to Fe(+2)

NO becomes NO(+1) and Fe becomes Fe(+1)..3d7....only three unpaired electron















[Note.......Wenever NO with Fe, NO is NO(+1)]

Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Analytical Geometry -> Eqn of Locus calculation -> Go to message
This Post 5 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
7 replies   
both of u are saluted... answer accepted
 
 
Go to:   

Top Offers for goIITians
Correspondence Courses
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Classroom/Crash Courses
Narayana - Kota , Delhi , Others
Brilliant Tutorials - Class , Crash
Aakash Institute - Medical , Engg
Online Test Series
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Mahesh Tutorials
AMITY      Sri Chaitanya