physics chemistry maths science forums
become expert I help I sign up I login
refer a friend - earn nickels!!   
 advanced
 
Home
Ask & Discuss Questions
Study Material
Experts Zone
Hang Out!
krishna.gopal   krishna.gopal is offline krishna.gopal's messages in the community
Message
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Optics -> WHAT IS THE WAVELENGTH OF WHITE LIGHT? -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
2 replies   
Perfect answer nivedh.
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Physical Chemistry -> Electron -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
1 replies   
Bond length is distance between hydrogen nucleus and chlorine nucleus. But bonded eectron pair between hydrogen and chlorine does not lie totally with chlorine so that we can say that a charge of -e is at chlorine atom and +e at hydrogen atom. It is some where in between hydrogen and chlorine and that is why dipole moment is ,e*l for HCl
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Analytical Geometry -> ellipse -reg -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
Ellipse is a set of point whose sum of distances from two fixed points remain constant. It is also a conic with ecentricity less then 1. Here also it will be great if you please ask some specific doubt.
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Analytical Geometry -> please help me to know about the waves on string and standard waves on string -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
1 replies   
Waves is generated on a string when you give a transberse motion to a part of string under tension.
When this wave is reflected from the fixed end of the string then this reflected wave interferes with orignal wave to form standing waves.
There is lot of stuff that can be told about these waves. Can you please ask a specific doubt
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Electricity -> GAUSS LAW -> Go to message
This Post 5 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
Here i am giving general method to solve this problem. On the disc make an ring of radius r and thickness dr.
Electric field at any point onthis ring = kQ/(r^2+a^2) and it makes an agle of cos inverse (a/sqrt(a^2+r^2)) with the normal to disc.So flux through this ring
d = (2*pi*r*dr)*(K*Q*a)/(a2+r2)3/2
Now integrate it from 0 to R, you will get flux through disc and hence the relation.
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> newton's laws of motion -> Go to message
This Post 2 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
When a person is sitting with a jerk. His velocity in downward direction first increases and then decrease. So there is first a downward acc and then an upward acc. So apparent weight will first increase and then decrease and finally willbe equall to true weight
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Electricity -> CURRENT ELECTRICITY -> Go to message
This Post 5 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
2 replies   
One question at a time
Drift velocity is drift of electron per unit time where drift is difined as position of eectron in electri field with respect to its position had there been no electric feild..
In during motion electron accelerates between collisions but it again attains zero velocity after collision. So when we are talking on time scales of collision times we assume electron to be accelerated and take drift velocity as acc*collision time.Now this velocity will be different for different electrons. It may be different even for same electron in different collisions. So on a large time scale we take average drift velocity and assume it to be constant and hence use equations of uniform motion.
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> shm hcv prob -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
Omi here also we what you are doing is applying a result directly without deriving it.
In my derivation if i had taken m1 and m2 instead of m and m i would have got omega = k(m1+m2)/(m1m2). From here we take out a direct result that when ever you have two masses m1 and m2 attached with spring of spring constant k assume that one is fixed and other has a mass of m1m2/(m1+m2) (called reduced mass) and find omega or time period directly.
And this thing should be absolutly clear to you that what i have done is derivation and what you are doing is just applying a result. It is OK to do so if you know the derivation and you are doing so just to save the time. But it is criminal to do so if you don't know how that result come. Because when it comes to applying same result in some other conditions you will have to make a decision whether you can apply it there are not. And you can do that only when you have an indepth understanding of result.
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Modern Physics -> physics -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
4 replies   
It is rotating today because it was rotating yesterday. No force it required to keep rotating a body if it is once set up in rotational motion
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Magnetism -> magnetism -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
2 replies   
We can say by symetry that fied wil be parallel to plane and perpendicular to dirction of current. As sheet is infinite so field should be uniform as well. Suppose we want to find field at a point P at a distance R from sheer. We make an Ampere's loop in form of rectangle of length l and bredth 2R through P such that sheet divides it in two equall part. AB and CD of length l are parallel to sheet while BC and DA are perpendicular to it.
   Applying amperes law on this loop
 
[ ][ ] B.ld  = Bl (for AB as path is parallel to field) +0(for BC as path is perpendicular to field)+Bl (for CD as path is parallel to field) +0(for DA as path is perpendicular to field)=2BL = mu_not*i_enclosed =mu_not*lamda*l
So B= mu_not*lamda/2 
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Magnetism -> electricity and magnetism -> Go to message
This Post 5 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
1 replies   
Let charge q is passed in time t. So current = q/t
Force on rod= iBl=(q/t)Bl
Acc = F/m = (q/t)*Bl/m
Final velocity = Acc*t = qBl/m
Or q= mv/Bl
I am getting mv/(Bl). Please check question once because i am not sure how it can be 2mv/(Bl)
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> Problem frm 'DOPPLER EFFECT' -H.C verma -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
2 replies   
It is not given where he is moving on x= 364 from +ve y to -ve y or -ve y to positive y. But Keeru has taken the motion from negative to pisitive and has given a perfect answer.Here i would like to explain one point.
cos(theta)=140/364 comes because cot(theta) = 140/336 So cos(theta)=140/sqrt(140^2+336^2)
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> About IITs and JEE -> About IIt paper pattern -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
1 replies   
HI friend,
The pattern of IIT JEE 2008 is still not official. We suppose that it will have only mains with an objective type paper as it was in 2007. But there are rumors around that this time it may be a subjective paper with a prilims in december and no one has any idea about what is the truth. So wait for official decleration in this matter.
As far as marks by toppers are concerned i think they lie somewhere between 75-85 percent
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> shm hcv prob -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
The only way to find  is to give small displacement dx to the body abd find the force acting on it. This will give force constant and from that you get . Please do not get into this buisness of getting to answers directly because what seems direct in one case may change in other. In this problem suppose total streching of dx is given to the string and left. In an inertial frame (center of mass frame is one such frame) each body is diplaced by dx/2 and force on each body is Kdx. So force constant for each body
 k' = F/(dx/2) = 2k
 = sqrt(2k/m)
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> small verification -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
2 replies   
Kinematics has nothing to do with newtons law as there we are not interested in what is causing acceleration while dynamics is all about newtons law as all the results there come from F=ma
 
 
Go to:   

Top Offers for goIITians
Correspondence Courses
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Classroom/Crash Courses
Narayana - Kota , Delhi , Others
Brilliant Tutorials - Class , Crash
Aakash Institute - Medical , Engg
Online Test Series
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Mahesh Tutorials
AMITY      Sri Chaitanya