IN PARALLEL PLATE CAPACITORS CAN A SYSTEM OF TWO PARALLEL PLATES OF EQUAL AREA , SAME CHARGE DENSITIES HAVE CAPACITANCE ?? 

    |+             +|                     E inside = 0

    |+             +|                     dv/dr =  0 

    |+             +|                    v= constant

    |+             +|                    hence potential is nonzero 

    |+             +|                   so c =q/v which is a finite value ????

    |+             +|                 

    |+             +|

pretty close call but i wud suggest u can hav an effect similar to hyperconjugation acting here , making nh3+-nh3+ have a partial d.bond charecter so shorter bond length now further i say this coz N and C have comparable sizes

no u shudnt segregate physical and organic and also inorganic for example the reaction mechanisms are many time reinforced by thermodynamic , kinetics etc which come under physical chem . now a reagent used may be inorganic so definitely u even study reagents .



all the three branches go hand in hand .

moreover many carbon compounds are inorganic look at co2 .

at the same time physical chem. deals with carbon which is also a physical element u see . so there are inter linkages between all these fields but for our convineance what ever is told to u in the above threads is correct.

Ø   

             ₊                                                   C = C

O==C---C---CH₃                   <           /        \

       |    |                                    C       C

     CH₃ CH₃                                             \  ₊ /

                                                        C

COMPOUND 1                     COMPOUND2

ITS GIVEN THAT COMPOUND2 IS MORE STABLE THAN ONE .

STABILISING FACTORS IN COMPOUND TWO INCLUDE HYPERCONJUGATION BY 4 ALPHA HYDROGENS

AND THE DOUBLE BOND SO FORMED IS IN CONJUGATION WITH C=C SO RESONANCE .

IN COMPOUND ONE THERE ARE SIX ALPHA HYDROGENS PLUS THE DOUBLE BOND IS IN CONJUGATION WITH C=O MAKING RESONANCE POSSIBLE AND INCREASING CLOUD DENSITY AROUND O SO ISNT COMPOUND 1 MORE STABLE THAN 2  ??

Ø   

MY COACHING MODULE SAYS PHENYL FREE RADICAL IS LESS STABLE THAN METHYL FREE RADICAL . BUT IN PHENYL FREE RADICAL DON’T U HAVE AROMATICITY  ?? SO WHAT MAKES METHYL FREE RADICAL MORE STABLE ??

Ø   

WHICH OF THE TAUTOMERIC FORM IS MORE STABLE ??

                  C –OH                                                    

                    //     \

             C        C

                  |          ||                                                    

    HO-- C        C—OH       

                    \\    /   

                  C

         OR

                  C ==O

                     /     \

             C        C

                  |           |                                                      

      O== C       C==O       

                      \    /   

                  C

Ø   

LASTLY,  A COMPOUND HAVING HIGHER DIPOLE MOMMENT IS MORE STABLE OR THAT WITH NO DIPOLE MOMMENT IS STABLE . I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT IF DIPOLE MOMMENT EXISTS THEN MOLECULES HAVE DIPOLE DIPOLE INTERACTIONS WHICH ACTUALLY STABILISES THE SYSTEM . BUT I SEE THAT MY TEACHERS SAY TRANS IS MORE STABLE ???????????

kirchoff laws aplly to both capacitors as well as resistors right so is there any difference in its application to resistors / capacitors ??

havent read it yet that's why im asking .