sign up I login
 advanced
refer a friend - earn nickels!!
me   me is offline me's messages in the community
Message
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Physical Chemistry -> Which is the very best books for physical, organic and inorganic chemistry. -> Go to message
This Post 2 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
6 replies   
if u wana crack jee then im afraid Solomon or Morrison and Boyd r not so good(atleast if u dont have plans of doing PhD in organic)
best combo is ---------------
P Bahadur - physical
arihant - organic
ncert - inorganic
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Organic Chemistry -> What doed OsO4 do as a reagent? -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
this reagent is used for introducing 2 OH groups on a C=C double bond
i.e. it give di-ol when used on alkenes
note - it gives syn addition
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Organic Chemistry -> Which is better Reducing agent? -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
13 replies   
LiAlH4
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> check dis que -> Go to message
This Post 5 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
4 replies   
see ravi

its easy to see that when body projected up comes back to projected position its speed is 19.6m/s downwards.
now from this instant it will follow other body's trajectory in same way as 2nd body do.

hence the only time gap is due to above mentioned path, that is clearly 4 sec.
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Differential Calculus -> assertion and reasoning -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
4 replies   
f(x) is continuous [1,3] and derivable in (1,3) and f(1)=f(3).So,Rolle's theorem holds.

at the same time, lagrange's mean value theoram is applicable to f(x) in any inteval.

but statement 2 is in no case proper explanation for statement 1
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Lounge -> which city are you from? -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
181 replies   
IM Anshul
PATIALA
PUNJAB
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Algebra -> Simple Mathematics problem..... (5) -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
here we can equation as
z = i^z
as i^i = -i
now
mod.z = mod.i^A+iB
= mod.(i^A * i^iB)
= mod.[i^A * (-i)^b]
= 1
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Electricity -> This might seem absurd...but still...Is permittivity a vector/scalar? -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
14 replies   
oh come on people
it is not any physical quantity,to be a scalar or vector
it is just a constant for a particular thing depending on its magnetic properties
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> toppling -> Go to message
This Post 5 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
11 replies   
see when biock just begin to topple it will come on one its edge
let it is going right
at this moment 2 forces produce torque at C.O.M.
1---normal reaction
2---friction
& in opp. direction
for just toppling these balance each other.
thus we get-----------------
umg*h/2 = mh*a
or
u = a/h(not its min u required)
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> toppling -> Go to message
This Post 5 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
11 replies   
im sorry X = a
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> toppling -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
11 replies   
u = X/h
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> toppling -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
11 replies   
u = X/h
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> toppling -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
11 replies   
u = X/h
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Differential Calculus -> Some Good Questions -> Go to message
This Post 4 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
6 replies   
3rd
first of we should realise infinity = infinty + 1 =infinity + 2 as infinity is such a large number that add. 1 or 2 dont make any difference.
denote f(infinity) = y
we so get --------
y = 1/3{y + 5/y)
or
3y = y + 5/y
or
2y=5/y
we get-----
y = (5/2)^1/2
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Thermal Physics -> answer. -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
6 replies   
zero degre celsius
 
 
Go to:   

Top Offers for goIITians
Correspondence Courses
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Classroom/Crash Courses
Narayana - Kota , Delhi , Others
Brilliant Tutorials - Class , Crash
Aakash Institute - Medical , Engg
Online Test Series
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Mahesh Tutorials
AMITY      Sri Chaitanya