| Message |
|
|
|
ok i take it that charge doesnot depend on mass now ans this
why cant we charge a photon
|
|
|
|
|
|
no i guess op tondon is not bad it is very gud i to have it
|
|
|
|
i guess u are right
i have also studied that force has to dec coz when we integrate small force with air as med and then by using brass the force is less in second case
|
|
|
|
|
when nacl is electrolysed we use hg coz then h+ is not discharged instead na is discharged why
|
|
|
|
i think u re ok but opls go in detail abt this part
this doesnt mean that charge depends on mass
|
|
|
|
see electric field moves in dec potential -ve has lower potential than the same amt of +ve so this may be the reason
secondly if u see the concept of electric lines then u observe that it is radial and the dist bw the lines inc showing that there is less potential
i am sorry for dipole
pls do tell me if i am wrong
|
|
|
|
|
till now no one has answered me if it is constant acc to u then the relation V=ER fails which is even true
|
|
|
|
|
just try to think more practical and realisitic and as they say make ur concepts very polished
|
|
|
|
|
faredwaals i agree but tell me do obcs not have heart or do they have different functioning i guess she was there to just ask about the rank and u know that the reserv will not come into picture then what the hell u got angry for i am totaly against reserv but at least i have a heart and feeling for some one who was deprived
|
|
|
|
oh pls thats sound more ochward
the basic reason is wht is al;ready explianed
if there is a charege of 1coulomb and other of 1000 coulomb then the larger one will have(conventionallly)less no of electrons as the one with +1 coulomb
now tthe bigger charge will try to attract the electrons of smaller charge which we call as induction thus it attracts pls correct me if i am wrong
|
|
|
|
|
pls explain why zinc is not such an electropositive metal and how
|
|
|
|
|
that is what my ques is that if V=0 then why we consider it to be constant
|
|
|
|
|
