physics chemistry maths science forums
become expert I help I sign up I login
refer a friend - earn nickels!!   
 advanced
 
Home
Ask & Discuss Questions
Study Material
Experts Zone
Hang Out!
hsbhatt   hsbhatt is online hsbhatt's messages in the community
Message
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Algebra -> Sequences - nice one -> Go to message
This Post 5 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
6 replies   
Well this is yet another instance of a sequence where trigonometric substitutions can save us a lot of sweat. For those who came in late, the reason I say "yet another" are http://www.goiit.com/posts/list/trignometry-if-a-b-are-positive-quantities-and-if-41432.htm and http://www.goiit.com/posts/list/algebra-salutes-assured-41758.htm#205608.
 
and  
 
If we dispose of the trivial case  = = 0, This form should remind us of the formulas of cos(A+B) and sin(A+B).
 So, how to get these expressions into a trigonometric form. If we let  = r cos and  = r sin where r = 2+2 then we can see that a2 = r2(cos2 - sin2) = r2cos(2). Similarly b2 = r2(sincos+sincos) = r2sin(2).
In this way, we get an = rncosn and bn = rnsinn.
 
Hence a1997 = b1 and b1997 = a1 is the same as
 r1997cos1997  = rsin and
r1997sin1997  = rcos
 
Squaring and adding gives r = 2+2  = 1
 
Hence the eqns are cos1997  = sin 
                             sin1997  =  cos
This gives 1997 = 2n+/2 - or 1998 = 2n+/2
or   = 2n/1998+/3996
Since we are looking for distinct values of = cos and  = sin, we need only take values of n =1,2,3,...,1998.
 
So, the total number of distinct ordered pairs (,) including (0,0) is 1999.
 
While I was gloating over my solution I looked at the solution provided by the author which I have copied in the post below. I'll look quite a fool then!
                         
 
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Algebra -> Sequences - nice one -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
6 replies   
Good. But I can wait for more replies I think
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Integral Calculus -> Instructive -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
16 replies   
you are a funny if resourceful guy priyesh
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Trignometry -> Trigonometry -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
9 replies   
i was joking man. i found it in a book called 103 Trigonometry Problems by Titu Andreescu and Zuming Feng under Introductory Problems. Nice book, but under Advanced Problems you find some beasty problems which only IMO guys find exciting
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Algebra -> Sequences - nice one -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
6 replies   
The sequence \{ a_n \}^{\infty}_{n=1}, \{ b_n \}^{\infty}_{n=1} are defined through a_1 = \alpha, b_1 = \beta, and a_{n+1} = \alpha a_n - \beta b_n, b_{n+1} = \beta a_n + \alpha b_n for all n \geq 1. How many pairs (\alpha, \beta) of real numbers are there such that

a_{1997} = b_1, \ \text{and} \ b_{1997} = a_1 \text{?} 
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Algebra -> IIT 2006 question... If r,s,t are prime numbers and p,q are +ve integers sch that lcm of -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
11 replies   
Even i am getting 360
 
Basically, the numbers r2, s4 and t2 have to appear in either number. This can be assigned in 2*2*2 = 8 ways.
 
Now if r2 appears in one number, the other can have r0 or r1 or r2 as its factors.
 
This reasoning gives 8*3*5*3 = 360 such ordered pairs
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Integral Calculus -> Instructive -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
16 replies   
go ahead! right or wrong
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Integral Calculus -> Instructive -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
16 replies   
No, you needn't go as far as that. It's meant to be for IIT aspirants not cosmologists!
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Trignometry -> Trigonometry -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
9 replies   
rocky, i think you meant A+B = 45o. Yeah you've got it.
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Trignometry -> Trigonometry -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
9 replies   
So, who do you think set the paper?
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Algebra -> in how many can you solve this? -> Go to message
This Post 20 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 4 votes )   [?]
2 replies   
Its a bit messy but alright:
 
Basically, the problem is to find the remainder when the number is divided by 100
 
(14)14^14 = (196)7^14 = (100n-4)7^14. = 100n - 47^14 (not the same n)
 
So, now we have to find the remainder when 47^14 is divided by 100.
 
47 = 16384 = 16400-16 = 100n-16
Hence the remainder when 47^14 is divided by 100 is the same as when 1614 = 428 is divided by 100. This may look intimidating but it can be resolved quite simply.
46 = 4096 = 51*100-4 = 100n-4.
428 = (46)4 * 64
     = (100n-4)4 * 64
     = (100n+44)*64
    = 100n+48
    = 100n + (100k-4)*16
    = 100k-64
 
Summarizing, 1414^14 = 100n-47^14
                                = 100n-(100k-64)
                               = 100m+64
Hence the last two digits are 64
 
I said it would be messy
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Algebra -> Probability involving divisibility of 2 no.s -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
5 replies   
hey thanx for the compliment. (blush)
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Trignometry -> If a,b are positive quantities and if -> Go to message
This Post 12 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 3 votes )   [?]
5 replies   
Well, I happened across this soln for the case a<b in a book. The author of the book says "By the way, this is a hard problem by any competition standard". Anyway here goes:
 
We have already seen in my previous post that a<b means an<bn for all n.
 
Part 1:
Now an+1/bn+1 = an+1/an+1bn = (an+1/bn ) = (an+bn)/2bn = (1+an/bn)/2
 
Since an/bn<1 Let an/bn = cos
 
Then an+1/bn+1 = (1+cos)/2 = cos/2
 
Hence if a/b = cos then an/bn = cos(/2n)
 
Part 2:
Now consider
(bn+1)2-(an+1)2  = (an+bn)/2  (bn-an+bn/2) = (bn2 - an2)/4
 
 Hence we get (bn2 - an2) = (b2-a2)/2n.
 
which gives bn(1 - an2/ bn2) = bn sin/2n = (b2-a2)/2n
 
In the limit n, if limit of the sequence {bn} is is l
Then l/2n = (b2-a2)/2n or l =  (b2-a2)/ where  = cos-1(a/b)
 
Hence limit {an} = limit {bn} = (b2-a2)/cos-1(a/b)
 
Phew!
 
This particular problem may be way above JEE level, but, one lesson we can surely draw is to consider trigonometric subsititutions in sequences. This forum has already seen an instance in http://www.goiit.com/posts/list/algebra-salutes-assured-41758.htm#205608
 
One example, consider a sequence x0 = a<1, xn = (1+xn-1)/2 find the limit of 2n(1-xn2).
 
 
 
 
 
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Integral Calculus -> inte of {(sinx)^1/n /(sinx)^1/n+(cosx)^1/n}dx..pls help me experts..!!(its not def int q)! -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
11 replies   
Is it a definite integral by any chance?
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Integral Calculus -> Find Integral -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
13 replies   
It is better you give your working raul.
 
 
Go to:   

Top Offers for goIITians
Correspondence Courses
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Classroom/Crash Courses
Narayana - Kota , Delhi , Others
Brilliant Tutorials - Class , Crash
Aakash Institute - Medical , Engg
Online Test Series
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Mahesh Tutorials
AMITY      Sri Chaitanya