10904him   10904him is offline 10904him's messages in the community
Message
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Electricity -> electrostatics -> Go to message
This Post 2 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
Potential at the centre of 1st ring = kQ1/R + kQ2 / R(-/2)
Potential at the centre of 2ndt ring = kQ2/R + kQ1 / R(-/2)
p.d = k(Q2-Q1){1-1/ -/2 ) / R
=k(Q2-Q1)(-/2 -1) / -/2 R
(B) ans
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Organic Chemistry -> organic chemistry -> Go to message
This Post 2 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
Answer is (b) also because since we know that bases are good leaving groups we can have the basicity order
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Electricity -> ocean of Resistance....... -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
This is a sense less question without some more data.
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Physical Chemistry -> Confusion -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
I would myself prefer answer (d) .
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Organic Chemistry -> MOrrison and Boyd -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
Reading Morrison is very interesting -----its very rude to say its lengthy ---I have not enjoyed any other book more---even if you read FOR FUN YOU WILL LEARN A LOT and that too faster.

Have you read Kekule's Dream of Benzene ring..........excellent....
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> FROM HCV -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
How obvious ....
The horse is pushed forward by the grounds reaction force --implies---horse pushes in backward direction---implies friction acts in forward direction.
Now when the wheel rotates the wheels move forward --implies friction is backward---(its a matter that the friction will oppose the motion.
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Physical Chemistry -> Confusion -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
Actually the answer given to us by our teacher is also c but I am confused that Raoults Law does not state anything about i .It is a matter of vant hoff's correction.
We do not write raoults law in the way as (c).
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Physical Chemistry -> eudiometry -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
Gas eudiometry deals with mainly the computation of amt of given gases in the reaction mixture which gives product mixture
It requires a knowledge like oxygen is absorbed by alkaline pyragallol ,CO2 by lime water.
The theory is long you should refer a good book.I studied it in by Brilliant's Corresp. Course
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Physical Chemistry -> Confusion -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
According to the raoult's law the rel. lowering of vapour pressure is directly proportional to-
a-moles of solvent
b-mole fraction of the solvent
c-i times the mol fraction of solute ,i -->vant hoff's factor
d-none of these
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Integral Calculus -> looks easy but.................... -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
Thats too confusing at the moment for me
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Trignometry -> ANYONE NEEDS A AIEEE PAPER?THEN GIVE IN YOUR IDS! I REALLY GAVE SOME TOUGH AND GOOD PAPERS -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
himanshu711@yahoo.com
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Electricity -> electricity -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
Question not clear
Explain the specific arrangements
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Physical Chemistry -> chemistry -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
Sorry the formatting went wrong

--------- Ist Group------2nd Group--------3rd Group
1I.P------low--------------low------------Moderately High
2I.P-----very high------- low---------------- High
3I.P.---very very high--very high-----------High
Prefer---ionic----------- ionic-------------- covalent bonding
Ex.------ Na--------------- Mg---------------- Al
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Physical Chemistry -> chemistry -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
Ist Group 2nd Group 3rd Group
1I.P low low Moderately High
2I.P very high low High
3I.P. very very high very high High
Prefer ionic ionic covalent bonding
Ex. Na Mg Al
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Physical Chemistry -> pls help me out -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
We know that the atomic size decreases across the period due to increase in the attractions with charge
Hence the given result but you are wrong to say that
Al < Mg ---Mg comes second in the period 3 and Al comes later

I hope you understand now
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Physical Chemistry -> chemistry -> Go to message
This Post 2 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
Solder is an alloy of tin and lead

Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Differential Calculus -> LIMITS -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
Have the soln but can't write it here
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Electricity -> es1 -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
(a)
Since when the alpha particle as it approaches the nucleus the P.E. increases and K.E. decreases i.e K.E. changes into P.E.
0.5mv^2 = k (q1.q2)/ r = X/r since kq1q2 = X = constant
r=2X/mv^2
When the velocity becomes thrice then the closest distance of approach becomes 1/9 times
Thus ,
x/9 is the answer.

Second Question--

Since V= E.d
Pot on surface = kq/R
Pot at 3R = kq/3R
thus acc to you V=2kq/3R
Thus V at 3R =V/2
Since V= E.d
E = V/6R (d) Ans
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Organic Chemistry -> Mechanisms -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
No book better than Morrison And Boyd for reaction mechanisms
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Physical Chemistry -> Molarity Questioned... -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
Zn + CuSO4 ------------> Cu + ZnSO4
0.4 1mol 0 0
0.4-x 1-x x x

1-x = 0.8
x= 0.2
Thus Zn = 0.2 but ZnSO4 is insoluble in water thus I think the M =0

else if you don't seek the solubility in water then 0.2
 
 
Go to: 
Free Sign Up!

Preparing for IIT-JEE ?

Arihant Revision Package for IIT JEE - Books, Practice Tests + Rank Predictor


@ INR 1,995/-

For Quick Info

Name

Mobile No.

Sponsored Ads