| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 19 May 2007 10:03:01 IST
|
|
|
Q. A uniform chain of length 'L' and weight 'W' is hanging vertically from ends A & B which are close together. At a given instant the end B is released. Find the tension at A when B has fallen a distance 'x' (x<L). Here I have understood almost everything that the total tension at A is due to 2 forces i.e. one due to the weight of the new length of the chain below A (L/2+x/2) and the other due to the rate of change of momentum of the falling chain. My doubt is that in the 2nd force, whether a small mass 'dm' falls through a distance x or x/2. In my book it's given that it falls through x/2 but I think that it falls through x distance. Anyways, the answer given in the book is T = W/2[1 + 3x/L] whereas I'm getting T = W/2[1 + 5x/L]. How much are you getting ?
|
If u do find my answers useful, please don't forget to rate me. I too always rate the best answerer. |
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 19 May 2007 11:45:05 IST
|
|
|
C'mon yaar! Is there no one to try it ? Please, I want an answer as quick as possible.
|
If u do find my answers useful, please don't forget to rate me. I too always rate the best answerer. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 19 May 2007 11:59:09 IST
|
|
|
look dude. what ur book says is correct. it does go down by x/2 as here we consider the mption of com and not the tip
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 19 May 2007 12:19:30 IST
|
|
|
Please explain it in detail. I'm totally confused after thinking on it the whole night yesterday. I've even checked it practically! It should be x.
|
If u do find my answers useful, please don't forget to rate me. I too always rate the best answerer. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 19 May 2007 12:32:53 IST
|
|
|
The answer given in the book seems to be incorrect. My approach is a bit different from urs. The left portion of the string is a variable mass system in which mass is entering. By Merchersky's equation, m(dv/dt) = Fext + urel (dm/dt) = Fext + urel (dm/dx)(dx/dt) As the left portion of the chain is in equilibrium, 0 = {T-(m/L)[(L/2)+(x/2)]}j +(- 2gxj)(m/L)( 2gx) T = (mg/L)[(L/2) + (5x/2)] = (W/2)[1+(5x/L)]
|
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 19 May 2007 17:51:13 IST
|
|
|
hi elessar pls tell me what is Merchersky's equation,
|
IIT- Imposible Is This(atleast fr meeeeeeeee) |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 19 May 2007 18:30:07 IST
|
|
|
m(dv/dt) = Fext + urel (dm/dt)
This is Merchersky's equation for a variable mass system urel = Relative velocity of the mass being gained/ejected w.r.t the system
|
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 20 May 2007 02:05:11 IST
|
|
|
Hi adisahay. I woul like to know what is dm in your book. Let chain be ACDB (in that order) Such that AC = L/2 (C is lowest point to begin with) AD = L+x/2 (D is lowest point when B has fallen x units) Now fall for each element is different. Fall for a point P in AC = 0 Fall for a point P in CD (CP =y) = 2y which will vary from zero for a P close to C to x for P close to D And it x for P lying on DB.
For section AC as a whole center of mass falls by 0 For section CD as a whole center of mass falls by x/2 For section DB as a whole center of mass falls by x
|
Krishna Gopal Singh
B.Tech Chemical Engg
IIT Delhi 2002
Currently doing PhD from IIT Delhi |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 20 May 2007 09:26:25 IST
|
|
|
Sir, 'dm', as given in the book is a small mass which I think is the mass of the point D mentioned by you. This point D, before falling, should be at height 'x' distance above(but it's x/2 in the book). This mass after falling throgh the distance x is stopped suddenly when it reaches the lowest point. Let the mass/unit length be 't', then dm = t*dx, where dx is the length of the segment dm. Now, the mass dm after falling through x distance acquires a velocity of  2gx. Suppose it is stopped in dt seconds, then the rate of change of momentum of this mass will be = the additional force due to this motion = dm*v/dt = t*dx*  2gx/dt =t*(dx/dt)*  2gx = t*(  2gx) 2 = 2gxt. Since the book has taken x/2 instead of x, the force comes out to be 'gxt'. THIS IS THE POINT OF MY CONFUSION.
|
If u do find my answers useful, please don't forget to rate me. I too always rate the best answerer. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|