| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28 Jul 2007 23:29:13 IST
|
|
|
please help whether to do these kind of questions by analysing graphs or other way: i am getting confused the freq and intensity of a light source are both doubled. (1)saturation photocurrent remains almost same (2)max k.e. of photoelectrons is doubled a.both true b.1 true 2 false c.1 false 2 true d.both false please reply soon!! aayush
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28 Jul 2007 23:40:24 IST
|
|
|
I would rather like doing such questions by equations. Graph is also a good idea, but i dont find myself very comfortable with them. As the intensity is doubled, the saturation photoelectric current will increase for sure. Hence i is false For the frequency, Let v represent frequency, KE1 max = hv - hvo If v is doubled KE2 max = 2hv - hvo = 2(hv - hvo) + hvo = 2KE1 + hvo Hence the KE max becomes greater than twice the initial KE with doubling the frequency. Hence ii is also false Hence the answer is d
|
HOPE U GOT IT... |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28 Jul 2007 23:49:24 IST
|
|
|
but frnd!! ans here given in hcv2 pg no.364 is b... but thanks for replying!!
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28 Jul 2007 23:50:13 IST
|
|
|
any more answers please!!! make it quick have to go..
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28 Jul 2007 23:58:46 IST
|
|
|
nooooooooooo saturation current (cut off current or stopping potential all means same) and photoelectric current dont mean the same thing....stopping potential is that min -ive potential given to anode in a photocell fr wich the photoelectric current becomes zero , denoted by Vs , it doesnt depend on intensity of light....... and abt K.E
let E1 and E2 be the K.E corr. to frequencies @ and 2@ . if Wo be the work func. so h@ = E1 + Wo 2h@ = E2 + Wo dividing 2 = E2 + Wo / E1 + Wo E2 = 2E1 + Wo it means KE will be more than doubled , if freq. is doubled ans will be b
|
I always like to walk in rain as no one can see me crying there :(
frnds are like diamonds , if u hit them , they don't break but they slip frm ur hands
-----It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not.----
*****wen love and skill work together--expect a masterpiece*****
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 29 Jul 2007 00:21:57 IST
|
|
|
ya...i agree with chimanshu...gud xplanation!!
|
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 29 Jul 2007 00:52:29 IST
|
|
|
Good work Himanshu.
Saturation current and photo-current are two different things. Dont confuse them. While the 2nd statement can easily be proved false by algebric relations. Also these can be proved by graphs.
|
Bipin Kumar Dubey
Chemical Dept.
IIT Kharagpur
|
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 29 Jul 2007 18:13:51 IST
|
|
|
how it can be solved by graphs?????
neways good work...
|
<div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:11px;">
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|