sign up I login
 advanced
refer a friend - earn nickels!!

Ask & Discuss Questions with Community & Experts

Moderation Team
 90 chars left    advanced
Ask iit jee aieee pet cbse icse state board experts Expert Question: Periodic table relating with electrons in orbitals.
Forum Index -> Physical Chemistry like the article? email it to a friend.  
Author Message
Anurag.Seth (205)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 29  [59 rates]

Anurag.Seth's Avatar

total posts: 530    
offline Offline
Q1) An orbital can have a maximum of 2electrons.
      Suppose  orbitals have 3electrons each(although it's impossible; clockwise & anticlockwise spin would get disturbed and much more) but then too,
what would be the number of groups in the periodic table in this condition.

@seth
    
nunoxic (1469)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 227  [394 rates]

nunoxic's Avatar

total posts: 1198    
offline Offline
is this a factual question or just something u though on ur way back from skool ?.....good question though ......ill think about it

Sometimes One Dream Is Enough To Light Up The Entire October Sky....

First Year Mechanical Engineering
Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
shvetha (6)

Cool goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 0  [3 rates]

shvetha's Avatar

total posts: 59    
offline Offline
anurag,
u doubt is true but actually its just impossible for a orbital to have 3 electrons.

I HEAR.........I FORGET
I SEE............I REMEMBER
I DO...........I UNDERSTAND
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
dude (0)

New kid on the Block

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 0  [0 rates]

dude's Avatar

total posts: 5    
offline Offline
48
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
umang (229)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 35  [62 rates]

umang's Avatar

total posts: 873    
offline Offline
Hey dude !
I hope u dont mind explaining the answer !!!!!

Umang
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
Anurag.Seth (205)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 29  [59 rates]

Anurag.Seth's Avatar

total posts: 530    
offline Offline
I thought the answer myself.
In the s block of Periodic table, due to an increase in an e- , it would now have 3 groups, i.e. maximum e- = 1s
thus groups in s-block=3
In the d-block there are 5 orbitals and hence increment in no. of e- =5.
i.e. max. e- = 5d15
thus groups added=5.
thus total groups in d-block=10+5=15.
In the p-block there are 3 orbitals and hence increment in no. of e- = 3
i.e. max. e- = 6p9
thus groups added=3
thus total groups in p-block = 6+3=9
 
to talk of f-block would be a foolish thing.
 
Hence,
           Total groups in Periodic table with each orbital having three e-
         = 3(s-block) + 15(d-block) + 9(p-block)
         =27
 
Hence according to my analysis the answer must be 27, if I'm wrong somewhere plz let me know.

@seth
 this reply: 4 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
umang (229)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 35  [62 rates]

umang's Avatar

total posts: 873    
offline Offline
Hey anurag ,
yes , I also got 27 as the answer . My approach is just as yours . I dont think the answer is wrong !!!

Umang
 this reply: 2 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
umang (229)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 35  [62 rates]

umang's Avatar

total posts: 873    
offline Offline
Happy ?????

Umang
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
smriti.mathur (442)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 70  bad job dude!! I dont approve of this answer! 1  [118 rates]

smriti.mathur's Avatar

total posts: 423    
offline Offline
If there be three electrons in one orbital, then the no. of groups would be 6

Lecturar, Organic Chemistry
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
Anurag.Seth (205)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 29  [59 rates]

Anurag.Seth's Avatar

total posts: 530    
offline Offline
Smriti Mam,
                  Please explain the way you thought it to be 6 groups.

@seth
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
smriti.mathur (442)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 70  bad job dude!! I dont approve of this answer! 1  [118 rates]

smriti.mathur's Avatar

total posts: 423    
offline Offline
Hey Anurag, according to your calculation, there is an overall increase in the total number of electrons, ie, there is an increase in the total number of elements known. What I have done is , adjusted the same electrons , three in one orbital, keeping the number of elements same.So if there would be three electrons in one orbital, the no. of groups will shrink.

Lecturar, Organic Chemistry
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
smriti.mathur (442)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 70  bad job dude!! I dont approve of this answer! 1  [118 rates]

smriti.mathur's Avatar

total posts: 423    
offline Offline
Well, the number of groups would be 12 not 6.

Lecturar, Organic Chemistry
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
Anurag.Seth (205)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 29  [59 rates]

Anurag.Seth's Avatar

total posts: 530    
offline Offline
Smriti Mam,
                 Still I didn't get through your explanation, plz explain a bit more.

@seth
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
umang (229)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 35  [62 rates]

umang's Avatar

total posts: 873    
offline Offline
Smriti mam ,
I hav understood what u hav done , but am not getting how u did it . Pls explain !!!!!!!
Thank you !

Umang
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
smriti.mathur (442)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian