| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28 Dec 2007 09:45:15 IST
|
|
|
The figure shows a block of mass m released from rest on the incline plane on a smooth wedge of mass M that is ''NOT FIXED " at its bottom to the floor.there is no friction between the block and the wedge.Find the acceleration of the block with respect to the wedge and the acceleration of the wedge.
|
ananth
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28 Dec 2007 10:06:11 IST
|
|
|
force=mgsin  a=gsin  the accleratio of the wedge=Mgcos 
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28 Dec 2007 11:39:40 IST
|
|
|
Assume the acceleration of the wedge to be a and then apply a pseudo force on the block = ma.
Now solve it. The acceleration of the block, now, is actually with respect to the wedge. And 'a' can also be calculated.
PS : nudge me if you have any doubts and rate me if you find this useful
|
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
   
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28 Dec 2007 11:40:43 IST
|
|
|
hey,,,if the block will accelerate..will it not become a non-inertial frame of reference..
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28 Dec 2007 11:45:43 IST
|
|
|
and the force contributing the acceleration of the wedge will be in the horizontal direction...not mgcos@
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28 Dec 2007 11:52:01 IST
|
|
|
@ tarun,
so what if it becomes a non-inertial frame.
All of us here know how to use the concept of pseudo force.
|
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
   
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28 Dec 2007 11:56:35 IST
|
|
|
Re:NEWTONS LAWS
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28 Dec 2007 12:24:47 IST
|
|
|
ya rajat,,,i was just giving that post earlier than you...i mean to say that we hav to apply pseudo force..........ans by rajvarun is wrong
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here's the solution: Let the acceleration of Wedge be "a1". Considering the motion of the block in frame of the wedge. The Forces acting on the block will be: 1)N - Normal Force 2)mg - Downward 3)ma1- forward (pseudo force) The Block is sliding down the inclined plane. we have: ma1Cos@ + mgSin@ = ma a = a1Cos@ + gSin@ ...........(1) also, N + ma1Sin@ = mgCos@........(2) Now we will consider the motion of the Wedge frm the ground fram.No Pseudo force is neede as the frame is Inertial. 1)Mg =Downward. 2)N =Normal to the incline by the block 3)N' =Normal upward by the horizontal ground. We have, NSin@ = Ma1 N = Ma1/Sin@...................(3) Putting the value from equation(3) in Equation(2) Ma1/Sin@ + ma1Sin@ = mgCos@ a1 = mgSin@Cos@ M+mSin2@ So acceleration of Wedge = mgSin@Cos@ M+mSin2@ In equation (1) a = a1Cos@ + gSin@ a = (mgSin@Cos@*Cos@/M+mSin2@) + gSin@ On solving the above expression we get: Acceleration of Block: a = (M+m)gSin@ M+mSin2@ Hope you find it useful. Cheers !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
|
Always available for help !
But Remember Don't hesitate to ask a good Question but
Be damn serious for Questioning a weak one.
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 24 points
(with 4 
in 6 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 30 Dec 2007 16:38:03 IST
|
|
|
I think this problem also be solved by applying a constraint relation on the wedge?...the relation in terms of acclerations is tan@=acc. Block/acc.Wedge and then if i solve,then the acc of the wedge g/(tan@+kCot@),where k is ratio of masses...................
i think we can also solve using conservation of mechanical energy instead of newtons 2nd law..??
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 31 Dec 2007 11:32:08 IST
|
|
|
waterdemon is perfectly right but the value of 'a' we got finally is not the absolute acceleration of block. It is the acceleration of block with reference to wedge. So, all this rel acceleration vector to the wedge's acceleration vector to get block's acceleration vector. It is essential to add the accelerations vectorially, not algebraically.
|
Satyaram B V,
General Secretary, Mandakini Hostel,
IIT Madras |
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 31 Dec 2007 11:33:53 IST
|
|
|
kmmankad is wrong. The expression he stated is correct only when the block is constrained to move vertically. but here that is not the case in this problem.
|
Satyaram B V,
General Secretary, Mandakini Hostel,
IIT Madras |
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 31 Dec 2007 22:13:32 IST
|
|
|
I realised tht 2.....Thnx
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|