| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 10 Feb 2008 13:41:01 IST
|
|
|
IIT 2006 question... If r,s,t are prime numbers and p,q are +ve integers sch that lcm of p,q is r2 s4 t2... then the number of ordered pairs p,q ar... plzz help m findin disparity wid the ans...
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11 Feb 2008 16:23:11 IST
|
|
|
Nice question...No wonder! x must be of the form , where and . Similarly and . Furthermore, at least one of , and must be equal to 5, and at least one of , and must be equal to 3.
Look at the a's first. Either one of them, or two of them, or all three of them, must be equal to 5. In the first case (when just one of them is equal to 5), there are three ways of choosing which one is equal to 5, and for each of these there are ways of assigning a value to the other two a's. If two of the a's are equal to 5, then again there are three ways in which this can happen, and for each of these there are 5 possible values for the "a" that is not equal to 5. Finally, if all three a's are equal to 5, there is only one way of doing this. Thus the total number of possible ways of assigning values to , and is
Now look at the possible values for , and . We can use the same analysis as before, except that this time one or more of the b's must be equal to 3, and the remaining b's (if any) have to take one of the three values 0, 1 or 2. Thus the total number of possible ways of assigning values to , and is  So, putting the a's and b's together, the answer to the problem should be that there are  possible triples . Edit: The answer is gave above is when are distinct primes and you restrict to be positive integers. Multiply that by if you want to drop the positivity assumption. If you want to drop the condition distinct prime you will need to give the prime factorisation of r and t.
|
Guide to latex:
http://www.goiit.com/posts/list/community-shelf-a-guide-to-latex-48056.htm
JEE and OLYMPIA INFINATUM
http://iit-redefined.theforum.name/index.php
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11 Feb 2008 16:28:22 IST
|
|
|
hey, is the answer 360?
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11 Feb 2008 19:22:52 IST
|
|
|
Even i am getting 360 Basically, the numbers r2, s4 and t2 have to appear in either number. This can be assigned in 2*2*2 = 8 ways. Now if r2 appears in one number, the other can have r0 or r1 or r2 as its factors. This reasoning gives 8*3*5*3 = 360 such ordered pairs
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 12 Feb 2008 19:23:00 IST
|
|
|
Hi guyz I too followed a similiar analogy but I am gettin a different ans- 225 Cases :numbers denote exponent for r in p q r 0 2 1 2 2 0,1,2 total 5 cases for t in p q same way 5 cases and for s in p q s 0 4 1 4 2 4 3 4 4 0,1,2,3,4 total 9 cases So total cases= 5*9*5= 225
|
this reply: 15 points
(with 3 
in 3 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 12 Feb 2008 19:30:56 IST
|
|
|
ans is 225.ihave solved it earlier
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 12 Feb 2008 19:40:32 IST
|
|
|
I can see my mistake now when you enumerate it. I was counting the case when both p and q have have r2 as a factor twice. So that's alright then.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 12 Feb 2008 19:42:01 IST
|
|
|
elastic and jagery are exactly correct the answer is 225
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 12 Feb 2008 19:42:18 IST
|
|
|
ANSWER IS 225
|
Glitter Graphics
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 16 Feb 2008 13:26:40 IST
|
|
|
i think the ans is 223... cuz the pair (1,1) is being repeated thrice... plzz chk...
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 16 Feb 2008 13:32:48 IST
|
|
|
yeah the answer is 225...this question is a particular case of this general question i came across yesterday
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 16 Feb 2008 13:46:49 IST
|
|
|
plzz check on what im finding out...
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|