| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Feb 2008 21:06:19 IST
|
|
|
More than can be correct:
Let f(x)=(x-1)m(x-2)n, x E R ,then each critical point of f(x) is either local maximum or local minimum when :
a) m=2,n=3
b) m=2,n=4
c) m=3,n=4
d) m=4,n=2
~ The Sniper
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Feb 2008 21:22:13 IST
|
|
|
Differentiate m(x-2)+n(x-1)=0 x= (2m+n)/(m+n) check by puttin value fom options
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Feb 2008 21:27:31 IST
|
|
|
m+n should be even is the requirement you are looking for.
So (b) and (d) are correct
|
Time wounds all heels |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Feb 2008 21:32:35 IST
|
|
|
sir the answer u have posted is right but may i have the solution.... getting a bit confused
|
" The difficult we do immediately, impossible takes a little longer "
--- U.S. Army
"It's better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and
not have it."
--- The Sniper
"You can get more with a kind word and a gun than you can with a
kind word. "
--- The Sniper
"Join the Army: travel to exotic distant lands; meet exciting,
unusual people and kill them. "
--- The Sniper
"The victor will never be asked if he told the truth."
--- Adolf Hitler
"Stop talking, start doing"
--- IBM
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Feb 2008 22:02:08 IST
|
|
|
Hey sorry, I thought you already have the solution.
I have to correct my answer a bit. It should be both m and n should be even.
With an expression like (x-1)m(x-2)n, the first derivative vanishes at 3 points, x=1, x=2 and a third point.
We can dispose of the third point easily as you can see that f"(x) is non-zero at that point.
So the critical points to worry about are x=1 and x=2.
You can easily see that fk(x) will go to zero at both points as long as k<min(m,n) as (x-1) and (x-2) appear in every term.
Each order of derivative reduces the degree of (x-1) and (x-2) by 1. So there is going to be a term that goes like (x-1)m-k (x-2)n.
Let's assume that m<n. So, this term becomes (x-2)n and every other term has (x-1) as a factor. Hence fm(x) becomes non-zero at x =1 and is zero for all fk(x) k<m. So from the sufficiency condition for x=1 to be an extremum, m has to be even. (I mean the sufficency condition that if fk(a) =0, for k<t, and ft(a) is non zero, then a is an extremum point if t is even and not if t is odd)
Similarly at fn(x), we have non-zero derivative at x =2 and so for extremum condition, n has to be even.
If m and n are not even, the extrema will not occur at these points.
|
Time wounds all heels |
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|