| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jun 2008 14:42:22 IST
|
|
|
LiAlH4 or NaBH4 ????????
|
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
        
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jun 2008 14:49:28 IST
|
|
|
LiAlH4
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jun 2008 14:50:29 IST
|
|
|
Why?????????
|
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
        
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jun 2008 14:57:51 IST
|
|
|
Q. LiAlH4 and NaBH4 both reduce carboxylic acids / ketones, but only LiAlH4 reduces a nitro group? Why doesn't NaBH4 reduce the Nitro group?
Ans.the first one is probably about the improved reactivity of lithium over sodium. Lithium loves oxygen more than sodium does; this is because nitro groups can be reduced with lithium aluminum hydride; you know that slightly basic sodium borohydride in alcohol or water is used for reduction; lithium aluminium hydride is not. That may be why the different reactivities are.
|
        
IF YOU MAKE YOURSELF PERFECT......
THEN THERE WILL BE ONE IDIOT LESS IN THIS WORLD!!!!!!!
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jun 2008 15:06:54 IST
|
|
|
but lialh4 is expensive
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jun 2008 15:11:24 IST
|
|
|
Yeah, LiAlH4 is expensive, but it dosen't stop it from being a better reducing agent!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Please rate this Q/A.
ASTANAVISTA BABE, |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jun 2008 15:38:54 IST
|
|
|
LiAlH4
DUE to presence if Li it can easily lose its 4 hydrogen
|
believe enthusiams and confidence coupled with concentration & hard work can do wonders. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jun 2008 15:42:30 IST
|
|
|
LiAlH4 ------> 4H
NaBH4 ------> NaBH3 + H
so since LiAlH4 gives 3 more hydride ions than NaBH4 hence it is a far more better reducing agent
|
"Imagination is more important than knowledge."
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jun 2008 16:01:40 IST
|
|
|
LiAlH4 is better than NaBH4 as u can reduce carboxylic group with LiAlH4 but not with NaBH4
|
You gotta do wat u gotta do |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Jun 2008 10:33:56 IST
|
|
|
LiAlH4 ismore reactive than NaBH4.
But at the same time handing of NaBH4 is easy.so if in any case we are able to use both we select NaBH4.
|
B.Tech IIT ROORKEE
faculty (chemistry) Career Launcher Ind Ltd.
Rakh tu rah per do chaar hi kadam magar jara tabiat se, ke manzil khud pe khud chal ke tere paas aayegi, are haalat ka rona rone wale, teri tadbeer(hard work) hi teri taqdeer badal payegi. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 6 Jun 2008 10:12:03 IST
|
|
|
actually NaBH4 is better since is a very selective reducing agent , reduces perticular functions in the compound
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 6 Jun 2008 10:20:09 IST
|
|
|
LiAlH4 is a better reducing agent than NaBH4. this is because the al atom has larger size as compared to boron hence the tendenceny to form a hydride(strong) is more in LiAlH4. as such the hydride produced by LiAlH4 is better reducing agent.
rate me if satisfied!!!!!!!!!
|
It is not easy to see how the more extreme forms of nationalism can long survive when men have seen the Earth in its true perspective as a single small globe against the stars. Arthur C. Clarke
http://removesuperstition.blogspot.com/
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 6 Jun 2008 10:56:33 IST
|
|
|
LiAlH4 is greater reducing agent. 4 xample LiAlH4 can reduce acid to alcohol where as another one can reduce acid to aldehyde...
|
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds -- Albert Einstein |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 6 Jun 2008 20:07:18 IST
|
|
|
it wud b surely b LiAlH4 b coz Li can easily lose d hydrogens if u refer d organic chemistry of ARIHANT den u wud find d correct reason to it rate surely if u find it useful
|
its time fr u to achive d goal wake up donot hesitate to do hard work |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|