| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 30 Jun 2008 15:17:21 IST
|
|
|
in the second law of kinematic eqn
x = ut + 1/2 at*2
if u = 0 then for constant acceleration t = 
ca anyone xplain me the double answer????????
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
netagive tym corresponds to d case-when body cumes to rest after travelling distance x(which will be -ve) n deacceleration(-ve) ...........here at dis x...tym will be past one(-ve).......... second ......+ve case is general case.............
|
nobody is wrong
even a stopped clock is right twice a day |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 30 Jun 2008 16:20:14 IST
|
|
|
I dont think here negative time has some logical meaning. I think its just becoz its a quadratic and u get 2 roots of a quadratic.
Take, x = 2 m, a = 1 m/s^2. U get, t = +,- 2 sec
I dont think t = -2 sec has some significance.
PLZ correct me if I am wrong.
|
The quality of a person's life is in direct proportion to their commitment to excellence, regardless of their chosen field of endeavor.
It is during our darkest moments that we must focus to see the light.
Check out my blog at:
http://tarinbansal.blogspot.com/
Posts:
Can marks really judge a student??
Some myths about Chemical Engineering.
(A must see for every student)
Back to goiit, this time with Baby Veerappan. :D |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 30 Jun 2008 16:26:54 IST
|
|
|
@ tarin it has a meaning physically it shows the time b4 the observation started whwer u bcame 0 hope u get it
|
this reply: 10 points
(with 2 
in 2 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 30 Jun 2008 16:55:20 IST
|
|
|
It means that it was at same position some time before as well If that motion is uniform acceleration from -sqrt(2x/a) to sqrt92x/a)
|
Krishna Gopal Singh
B.Tech Chemical Engg
IIT Delhi 2002
Currently doing PhD from IIT Delhi |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jul 2008 10:24:47 IST
|
|
|
still not clear guys...........
does it mean that the negative sign has no meaning physically ..........but graphically it has some..............????????
plzzz correct me if i m wrong .................
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jul 2008 11:39:40 IST
|
|
|
Negative time is meaningless.
|
    
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jul 2008 11:44:40 IST
|
|
|
I think it is like this :
Consider a stone falling from a height.
h=20m
a=10/m^2
u=0
v=u+at
x=1/2at^2
t= +/- root(2x/a)
t= 2 s ,-2 s
v=0+10 t
v=20m/s,-20m/s
Here you know that after 2s the stone will reach the ground traveling 20 m.
If you go back to -2 s , in this gravity system we know that the stone should have been thrown up 2 seconds before with velocity=-20m/s(ie. upwards) Then only it can reach the starting point at time=0 , u=0 ,h=20m.
In other words the stone was at x=20m even when t=-2 s provided we did not physically carry the stone to the height of 20 m and dropped it from there.
I hope it is clear!
|
SLOW AND STEADY WINS THE RACE |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jul 2008 12:06:56 IST
|
|
|
See, when u make an observation u do the zero-setting of time completely arbitrarily (i.e. as per ur convenenience).
So the same physical phenomena may be going on before ur specified zero - time ,just as well !!
what is 'u' ? it is the velocity at that arbitary zero-time . u= 0 means that u count ur time when the velocity is zero .
at t= - sqrt(2x/a) before ur specified time -zero the paticle was at same position after t= sqrt(2x/a) provided the particle was accelarting just the same way as before and after the time-zero .
So it is completely feasible ( -ve time ) . But if it is given in the qn that the particle was at rest before and then started accelarating after t>0 , then it is simply violating the underlined condition and it is not giving the correct answer .
I hope it is clear now .
|
this reply: 15 points
(with 3 
in 3 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 2 Jul 2008 10:13:36 IST
|
|
|
we usually reject the negetive part of the answer we get.but its not true.IT HAS A PHYSICAL MEANING. if u see any graph of motion we take the negetive tym.That depends upon where v start from...lyk the tym at which we start observing the motion...we frame it as t=0s,but even before our observation the body must be in a state of rest or motion whatever it is.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 2 Jul 2008 10:15:16 IST
|
|
|
to indicate that tym that is before our observation we take the tym negetive,But lemme tell ya it ha(-ve tym)more application in graphs.In numericals we usually reject the negetive case.hope my answer helped u
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|