sign up I login
 advanced
refer a friend - earn nickels!!

Ask & Discuss Questions with Community & Experts

Moderation Team
 90 chars left    advanced
Ask iit jee aieee pet cbse icse state board community Community Discussion Question: Inequality
Forum Index -> Algebra like the article? email it to a friend.  
Author Message
hsbhatt (5020)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 946  [1091 rates]

hsbhatt's Avatar

total posts: 1510    
offline Offline

Which is greater - \sin 1 \ \text{or} \ \log_3 \sqrt 7


Note: that is 1 radian not 1 degree.


Time wounds all heels
    
gaurav_cheetah (47)

Hot goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 7  [13 rates]

gaurav_cheetah's Avatar

total posts: 136    
offline Offline
sin 1 is o.84...
log 3(root) 7 is 0.88....

hence, the log one is greater

Agar aap 90 baar paap karoge to keval 45 baar hi pakde jaoge......batao
kyu????* *


b'cos.... sin90=cot 45
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
hsbhatt (5020)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 946  [1091 rates]

hsbhatt's Avatar

total posts: 1510    
offline Offline

obviously i am looking for a more decisive solution.


Anyone?


Time wounds all heels
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
hsbhatt (5020)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 946  [1091 rates]

hsbhatt's Avatar

total posts: 1510    
offline Offline

there used to be a time in this forum where there would at least be a lively discussion on this forum if the question itself had not been demolished by now.


Whats up with you guys???


Time wounds all heels
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
GoNik (197)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 31  [52 rates]

GoNik's Avatar

total posts: 964    
offline Offline
sir actually everyones busy wid counselling...mayb thats why theres noone...sry

i am well....and hope u r in the same well....
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
Decoder (487)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 75  [131 rates]

Decoder's Avatar

total posts: 498    
offline Offline
let f(x) = sinx ....g(x)= lnx...

the latter is monotinic incresing...

let any sign( <=> ) ..taking it as " o" exist between ...for some x...

f(1) o g(7) / g(9) ...

subtracting 1...

f(1) - 1 o g(7) - g(9) / g(9)

multiplying -1....

so sign in o is changed...

now dividing by 2 both sides...

1 - f(1) / 2 o* g(9) -g(7) / 2g(9)...

now rhs is g'(x) ..for some 7
1 - f(1) / 2 o* g'(c) / g(9)...


my trial over...damn..






Diamonds r formed under greatest pressures..
so r the champs.


Kriteesh..


 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
Conjurer (615)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 107  [147 rates]

Conjurer's Avatar

total posts: 441    
offline Offline

Maybe you can give us a hint ? The two terms seem so much unrelated? What should we look for in such problems?


Let us learn to dream, gentlemen, and then perhaps we shall learn the truth.
- August Kekule
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
Decoder (487)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 75  [131 rates]

Decoder's Avatar

total posts: 498    
offline Offline
can we actually make something out of wic i have calculated in my failed trial...

please give us hint..wic topic is applied here...

Diamonds r formed under greatest pressures..
so r the champs.


Kriteesh..


 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
hsbhatt (5020)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 946  [1091 rates]

hsbhatt's Avatar

total posts: 1510    
offline Offline

For a start 1 radian is closest to which familiar angle


Time wounds all heels
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
feynmann (2236)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 404  [512 rates]

feynmann's Avatar

total posts: 815    
offline Offline

1 rad< 60 deg


again sine is an increasing fn in ( 0 to pi/2)


so sin 1< sqrt(3)/2


so we have to prove 7>3^(sqrt 3)

 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
sandeepramesh (1247)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 201  [322 rates]

sandeepramesh's Avatar

total posts: 1182    
offline Offline

\sin 1 < \sin 60^{\circ} = \frac {\sqrt{3}}{2}

TPT \sin 1 < \log_{3}{\sqrt{7}} \leftrightarrow \frac {\sqrt{3}}{2} < \log_{3}{\sqrt{7}} \implies \text{TPT} \sqrt{3} < \log_{3} {7} \implies \text{TPT} 3^{\sqrt{3}} < 7 \implies \text{TPT} 3^{\sqrt{3}-1} < 2.33 < \frac {7}{3} \implies \text{TPT} 3^{\sqrt{3}-1} < 3^{\frac {3}{4}} < 2.33 \implies \text{TPT} 3^3 < (2.33)^4 which is true Smile

Hence proved Mr. Green Razz

 this reply: 5 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
sandeepramesh (1247)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 201  [322 rates]

sandeepramesh's Avatar

total posts: 1182    
offline Offline

Sorry Feynmann, didnt see your start :)


PS: Ignore the extra TPT at the bottom!

 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
hsbhatt (5020)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 946  [1091 rates]

hsbhatt's Avatar

total posts: 1510    
offline Offline

My solution:


\sin 1 < \sin 60^{\circ} = \frac{\sqrt 3}{2}}


So, we have to prove that 3^{\sqrt 3} < 7


After coming to this stage, you must still conclusively prove the inequality.


First I establish that \sqrt 3 < \frac{7}{4}, this can easily be proved by squaring both sides etc.


Now if 3^{ \frac{7}{4}} < 7  or equivalently 3^7 < 7^4  we are done.


3^7 = 2187; 7^4 = 2401 and so the inequality holds true.


 


Time wounds all heels
 this reply: 10 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
sandeepramesh (1247)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 201  [322 rates]

sandeepramesh's Avatar

total posts: 1182    
offline Offline

To make it more simpler


Continuing my solution Mr. Green



Now (2.33)^4 > (2.3)^4 = (5.29)^2 > (5.25)^2 = \left(\frac {21}{4}\right)^2 = \frac {441}{16} = 27.5\cdots > 27 = 3^3

Hence Proved Mr. Green

 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate