| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jul 2008 10:35:32 IST
|
|
|
Which is greater - 
Note: that is 1 radian not 1 degree.
|
Time wounds all heels |
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jul 2008 12:04:29 IST
|
|
|
sin 1 is o.84... log 3(root) 7 is 0.88....
hence, the log one is greater
|
Agar aap 90 baar paap karoge to keval 45 baar hi pakde jaoge......batao
kyu????* *
b'cos.... sin90=cot 45 |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jul 2008 18:22:55 IST
|
|
|
obviously i am looking for a more decisive solution.
Anyone?
|
Time wounds all heels |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jul 2008 18:58:47 IST
|
|
|
there used to be a time in this forum where there would at least be a lively discussion on this forum if the question itself had not been demolished by now.
Whats up with you guys???
|
Time wounds all heels |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jul 2008 19:07:38 IST
|
|
|
sir actually everyones busy wid counselling...mayb thats why theres noone...sry
|
i am well....and hope u r in the same well.... |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jul 2008 19:27:56 IST
|
|
|
let f(x) = sinx ....g(x)= lnx...
the latter is monotinic incresing...
let any sign( <=> ) ..taking it as " o" exist between ...for some x...
f(1) o g(7) / g(9) ...
subtracting 1...
f(1) - 1 o g(7) - g(9) / g(9)
multiplying -1....
so sign in o is changed...
now dividing by 2 both sides...
1 - f(1) / 2 o* g(9) -g(7) / 2g(9)...
now rhs is g'(x) ..for some 7 1 - f(1) / 2 o* g'(c) / g(9)...
my trial over...damn..
|
Don't Dream ..Do the dream...
Rock On ....
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jul 2008 19:29:04 IST
|
|
|
Maybe you can give us a hint ? The two terms seem so much unrelated? What should we look for in such problems?
|
Let us learn to dream, gentlemen, and then perhaps we shall learn the truth.
- August Kekule |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jul 2008 19:31:18 IST
|
|
|
can we actually make something out of wic i have calculated in my failed trial...
please give us hint..wic topic is applied here...
|
Don't Dream ..Do the dream...
Rock On ....
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jul 2008 19:35:43 IST
|
|
|
For a start 1 radian is closest to which familiar angle
|
Time wounds all heels |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jul 2008 21:00:56 IST
|
|
|
1 rad< 60 deg
again sine is an increasing fn in ( 0 to pi/2)
so sin 1< sqrt(3)/2
so we have to prove 7>3^(sqrt 3)
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jul 2008 21:02:03 IST
|
|
|
TPT which is true
Hence proved 
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jul 2008 21:02:26 IST
|
|
|
Sorry Feynmann, didnt see your start :)
PS: Ignore the extra TPT at the bottom!
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 2 Jul 2008 09:30:35 IST
|
|
|
My solution:

So, we have to prove that 
After coming to this stage, you must still conclusively prove the inequality.
First I establish that , this can easily be proved by squaring both sides etc.
Now if or equivalently we are done.
and so the inequality holds true.
|
Time wounds all heels |
this reply: 10 points
(with 2 
in 2 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 2 Jul 2008 11:06:38 IST
|
|
|
To make it more simpler
Continuing my solution
Now
Hence Proved 
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|