| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Jul 2008 21:33:40 IST
|
|
|
integrate sinx/x
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Jul 2008 21:42:30 IST
|
|
|
its not integrable as the function is not continuous at x=0
|
BE (Hons) Computer science,
Bits Pilani Goa campus |
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Jul 2008 21:53:59 IST
|
|
|
This can be integrated only if the limits are given, as sin x/ x is discontinuous at x=0.
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Jul 2008 22:34:25 IST
|
|
|
i think if we expand sinx i.e. sinx expansion and divide it with x we may get the answer.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Jul 2008 23:07:48 IST
|
|
|
how do we know if the function is integrable or not?
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Jul 2008 23:11:35 IST
|
|
|
it is based on continuity of a function.
|
BE HAPPY.
MAKE OTHERS HAPPY. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Jul 2008 23:14:01 IST
|
|
|
plzz explain
rate assured
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Jul 2008 23:19:44 IST
|
|
|
if a function is continous on its entire domain or a part of its domain then the function is derrivable or integrable on that particular domain.
|
BE HAPPY.
MAKE OTHERS HAPPY. |
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 10 Jul 2008 00:57:30 IST
|
|
|

|
"Before you start some work, always ask yourself three questions - Why am I doing it, What the results might be and Will I be successful. Only when you think deeply and find satisfactory answers to these questions, go ahead."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275 BC) |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 10 Jul 2008 18:04:53 IST
|
|
|
ye kya
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 10 Jul 2008 18:15:48 IST
|
|
|
Check this coolkrazy007
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SineIntegral.html
|
"Before you start some work, always ask yourself three questions - Why am I doing it, What the results might be and Will I be successful. Only when you think deeply and find satisfactory answers to these questions, go ahead."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275 BC) |
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 10 Jul 2008 20:03:20 IST
|
|
|
Plz don't mislead .
roopa 1991 has given a completely wrong condition on integrability .It has nothing to do with continuity of the fn at a single point .
All of u have integrated ( defnite integral ) box fn . Now that's discontinuous at every integral point ,yet the definite integral exists.
The qn is whether we can integrate it by using a closed form formula or not ( note Si(x) is not a closed form fn . )
And as this regards ,I can say that this indefinite integral can't be integrated in a closed form formula using elementary functions .
Yet definite integral of this fn in the range ( -inf to inf ) or (0 to inf ) has a closed form formula ( pi and pi/2 respectively ).
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 10 Jul 2008 20:04:22 IST
|
|
|
Plz don't mislead .
roopa 1991 has given a completely wrong condition on integrability .It has nothing to do with continuity of the fn at a single point .
All of u have integrated ( defnite integral ) box fn . Now that's discontinuous at every integral point ,yet the definite integral exists.
The qn is whether we can integrate it by using a closed form formula or not ( note Si(x) is not a closed form fn . )
And in this regards ,I can say that this indefinite integral can't be integrated in a closed form formula using elementary functions .
Yet definite integral of this fn in the range ( -inf to inf ) or (0 to inf ) has a closed form formula ( pi and pi/2 respectively ).
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 12 Jul 2008 18:34:44 IST
|
|
|
thnxx
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|