sign up I login
 advanced
refer a friend - earn nickels!!

Ask & Discuss Questions with Community & Experts

Moderation Team
 90 chars left    advanced
Ask iit jee aieee pet cbse icse state board community Community Discussion Question: A stone thrown up-effect air resistance in time?
Forum Index -> Mechanics like the article? email it to a friend.  
Author Message
snail (170)

Hot goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 24  [49 rates]

snail's Avatar

total posts: 124    
offline Offline

A stone vertically thrown up with velocity v takes t seconds to reach back without cosidering air resistance. Now due to the air resistance will this time increase, decrease or remain same ? Pls justify your answer! I don't know the answer.


SLOW AND STEADY WINS THE RACE
    
shivam999 (1213)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 215  [284 rates]

shivam999's Avatar

total posts: 962    
offline Offline

Probably air resistance do not effect the velocity of  a particle !!!! since it has its definite value then also it is so small that it could be neglected !!! so the time 't' will remain same !!! CORRECT ME EVERYONE IF I'AM WRONG!!!!





The study of error is not only in the highest degree prophylactic, but it serves as a stimulating introduction to the study of truth.......



THIS IS MAH LOVE................ I WANNA SCRATCH THE WHOLE LIFE LIKE THIS ONLY........................ :-)








 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
abhiforiit (852)

Scorching goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 150  [201 rates]

abhiforiit's Avatar

total posts: 262    
offline Offline
first of all it depends on the mass of the body if the body is lighter than the air resistance it takes more time to reach n if mass is more than the air resistance the air resustance can be neglected !!!!

Ex : take a feather or a leaf when there is no air flow the leaf falls earlier than when there is air it tsakes more time to fall !!!






@Bh! FOR ME { life = MU$IC }





 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
snail (170)

Hot goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 24  [49 rates]

snail's Avatar

total posts: 124    
offline Offline

Suppose it is a  round stone whose density is far more than air. I felt that it will go to a lesser height due to air resistance and so total traverse time may not change. We are discussing the effect if it is not neglected. It is true that effect is negligible. Still I am eager to know what it is?


Pls continue discussion!!!


SLOW AND STEADY WINS THE RACE
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
sapna.sahani (114)

Hot goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 16  [33 rates]

sapna.sahani's Avatar

total posts: 153    
offline Offline

i guess it will take less time bcoz due to air resistance it will travel less distance and thus will take less time to come back.........

 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
varun.tinkle (1370)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 236  [331 rates]

varun.tinkle's Avatar

total posts: 1353    
offline Offline
WILL DECREASE CERTAINLY

From shadows a light shall spring
Renewed shall be blade that's broken
The crown less again shall be king.

MY BLOG
http://my.opera.com/vu2rje/blog/
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
snail (170)

Hot goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 24  [49 rates]

snail's Avatar

total posts: 124    
offline Offline

While going up the forces opposing motion are mg+f  instead of mg, so time to reach max. height will be less(ofcourse height will be less).


While coming down force mg supports motion and f opposes, (mg-f) so it will be slower.


Net result could be that there will be no change in total time.


After seeing the varying opinion of everyone, I feel that question itself was wrongly placed, in the sense that there can't be a definite answer as it depends on various factors such as initial velocity,stones density, its shape, terminal velocity etc.


SLOW AND STEADY WINS THE RACE
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
Little_Master (288)

Scorching goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 48  [72 rates]

Little_Master's Avatar

total posts: 200    
offline Offline

Dude, I think total time will not change, but reason is different.


We know that period of a simple pendulum does not change when amplitude comes down due to air friction!!!


So here also time may not change if it is a stone.


If A is a success in life, then A equals x plus y plus z. Work is x; y is play; and z is keeping your mouth shut.




[url=http://sig.graphicsfactory.com/]

[/url]
Glitter Graphics
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
ravi00 (291)

Scorching goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 45  [78 rates]

ravi00's Avatar

total posts: 280    
offline Offline
while descent time of free fall will increase coz of air resistance nd viscous force of air....

so net g acting on body will decrease leading to high time of descent

RATE ME IF MY ANS IS CORRECT.....
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
saurabh_reincarnated (236)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 38  [61 rates]

saurabh_reincarnated's Avatar

total posts: 334    
offline Offline

cant say so easily...


y dont u juss calculate... problem is tha whn there is an additional force opposing motion distance travelled in two cases is different.... and while going up and coming down acceleraton of body changes in case of air resistance... a is acc due to friction by air


like let initial vel =u


final vel=0.. acc =g => time taken = u/g...


total time = 2u/g


now


2nd case: whle going up ... 0=u-(g+a)t  => t= u/(g+a)


and 0= u^2 -2(g+a)s =>s=u^2/2(g+a)


now while going down


s is same.... but acceleration is g-a


=> s= 1/2 (g-a)t^2...(putting value of s)


=> t^2 =u^2/(g+a)(g-a)... => t= root of u^2/(g+a)(g-a)...


now total time=


u/g+a +u/root(g+a)(g-a).... =/= 2u/g


 


we thus have conditions depending upon magnitude of a....


cheers!!! :)

 this reply: 2 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
spideyunlimited (4221)

Moderator

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 705  [1053 rates]

spideyunlimited's Avatar

total posts: 3117    
online Online
Just solve the equations of motion and use g/3 or g/2 or some fraction of g instead of using g itself, and see.

---------------------------------------------------------------

- Gaurav Ragtah (spideyunlimited)
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
snail (170)

Hot goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 24  [49 rates]

snail's Avatar

total posts: 124    
offline Offline

@saurabh_reincarnated


Thanks for the effort. I think it is a complex problem. Your 'a' is not constant. It is a function of velocity.


As per this formula it appears that time is decreasing.


SLOW AND STEADY WINS THE RACE
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
ravi00 (291)

Scorching goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 45  [78 rates]

ravi00's Avatar

total posts: 280    
offline Offline
@saurabh
k....yaaar....i ll caluculate nd give u
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
ravi00 (291)

Scorching goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 45  [78 rates]

ravi00's Avatar

total posts: 280    
offline Offline

TIME OF ASCENT..


 


LETZ TAKE THE NET FORCE ON THE BODY...WHEN IT IS IN ITS ASCENT..


 


NET FORCE=mg+Fair


 


mg'=mg+Fair


 


g'=g+Fair/m


 


Ta=u/g=(root2g'h)/(g+f/m)


 


    =root(2(g+f/m)h/(g+f/m)2)  (by substituting g'=g+f/m)


 


    =root(2h/g+f/m)


 


similarly.....Td=root(2h/g-f/m)


 


so tless than td.


 


RATE ME IF MY ANS IS SATISFACTORY....

 this reply: 5 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate