| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 18 Apr 2007 11:45:19 IST
|
|
|
if negative charge is placed near positive test charge then what will be the direction of the electric field?
|
i am the genius....... |
|
|
|
18 Apr 2007 11:57:22 IST
|
|
|
from positive to negative charge
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
18 Apr 2007 12:00:50 IST
|
|
|
in the opposite direction
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
19 Apr 2007 21:22:20 IST
|
|
|
Well I agree with antony.
|
Ken
From: UNITED STATES, Green Bay, Wisconsin
 |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
19 Apr 2007 21:25:00 IST
|
|
|
i am confuse wheather sachin ask this quection as a joke or he was serious
|
Beat others otherwise they will beat u |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
19 Apr 2007 21:46:08 IST
|
|
|
field will be from + 2 - only in between the charges
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
19 Apr 2007 22:17:28 IST
|
|
|
Electric fields direction is always away from a positive chrge n towards a negative charge ......in this case where a positive n negative charge is kept,the net field will be from positive to negative charge.........for example u take a dipole,field is in the direction from positive to negative charge
|
Krishnan |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
19 Apr 2007 22:57:07 IST
|
|
|
are u sure u r asking the right question ??
i guess the answer is prety fundamental....from +ve to -ve
|
khud hi ko kar buland itna ki khuda bhi tujhse puche ...bol bande , teri raza kya hai |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
27 Apr 2007 16:31:14 IST
|
|
|
obviously from +ve to -ve is the direction of electric field.
|
The Scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, & he delights in it because it is beautiful. If nature were not beautiful, it would not be worth knowing, life would not be worth living. Ofcourse I do not here speak of that beauty that strikes the senses, the beauty of qualities & appearances; not that I undervalue such beauty, far from it, but it has nothing to do with science; I mean that profounder beauty which comes from the harmoniuos order of the parts, & which a pure intelligence can grasp. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|
Moderation Team
![[Up]](/templates/default/images/icon_up.gif "[Up]"){kind=icon}
1
