sign up I login
 advanced
» win an I-Phone. check i-points

Ask & Discuss Questions with Community & Experts

Moderation Team
Ask iit jee aieee pet cbse icse state board community Discussion Response Post to: Think differently
Forum Index -> Lounge -> View Full Question like the article? email it to a friend.  
Author Message
A.Vignesh (124)

Hot goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 22  [29 rates]

A.Vignesh's Avatar

total posts: 107    
offline Offline
From An Excerpt.....
       
        Some time ago I received a call from a colleague. He was about to give a
student a zero for his answer to a physics question, while the student
claimed a perfect score. The instructor and the student agreed to an
impartial arbiter, and I was selected.

I read the
examination question:

"SHOW HOW IT IS POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE THE HEIGHT OF A TALL BUILDING WITH
THE
AID OF A BAROMETER."


The student had answered
, "Take the barometer to the top of the building,
attach a ! long rope to it, lower it to the street, and then bring it up,
measuring the length of the rope. The length of the rope is the height of
the building."


The student really had a strong case for full credit since he had really
answered the question completely and correctly!
On the other hand, if full
credit were given, it could well contribute to a
high grade in his physics
course and to certify competence in physics, but the answer did not confirm
this.

I suggested that the student have another try. I gave the student six
minutes to answer the question with the warning that the answer
should show
some knowledge of physics
. At the end of five minutes, he had not written
anything. I asked if he wished to give up,
but he said he had many answers
to this problem; he was just thinking of the best one
. I excused myself for
interrupting him and asked him to please go on.

In the next minute, he dashed off his answer, which read:

"Take the barometer to the top of the building and lean over the edge of
the
roof. Drop the barometer, timing its fall with a stopwatch. Then, using the
formula x=0.5*a*t^^2,calculate the height of the building."


At this point, I asked my colleague if he would give up. He conceded, and
gave the student almost full credit.

While leaving my colleague's office,
I recalled that the student had said
that he had other answers to the problem, so I asked him what they were.


"Well," said the student, "there are many ways of getting the
height of a
tall building with the aid of a barometer
.

For example, you could take the barometer out on a sunny day and measure the
height of the barometer, the length of its shadow, and the length of the
shadow of the building, and by the use of simple proportion, determine the
height of the building."


"Fine," I said, "and others?"

"Yes," said the student, "there is a very basic measurement
method you will
like. In this method, you take the barometer and begin to walk up the
stairs. As you climb the stairs, you mark off the length of the barometer
along the wall. You then count the number of marks, and this will give you
the height of the building in barometer units."


"A very direct method."

"
Of course. If you want a more sophisticated method, you can tie the
barometer to the end of a string, swing it as a pendulum, and determine the
value of g at the street level and at the top of the building.

>
From the difference between the two values of g, the height of the

building, in principle, can be calculated."


"
On this same tact, you could take the barometer to the top of the
building,
attach a long rope to it, lower it to just above the street, and then swing
it as a pendulum. You could then calculate the height of the building by the
period of the precession".


"Finally," he concluded, "there are many other ways of solving
the problem.
Probably
the best," he said, "is to take the barometer to the basement
and
knock on the superintendent's door. When the superintendent answers, you
speak to him as follows:

'Mr. Superintendent, here is a fine barometer. If you will tell me the
height of the building, I will give you this barometer."


At this point, I asked the student if he really did not know the
conventional answer to this question. He admitted that he did, but said that
he was fed up with high school and college instructors trying to teach him
how to think.

The student was
Neils Bohr (quantum theory & physics & mechanics,
hydrogen
atom guru etc ) and the arbiter Rutherford.

THINK DIFFERENT!!!!

 this reply: 50 points  (with 10 Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 10 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
 

 Aakash Institute IIT/ AIEEE/ Medical Crash Course
Name  
E-mail  
Phone  
Mobile  
** Hurry. Exclusive goIIT Offer. Limited Seats Only!
available in: New Delhi, Amritsar, Bhatinda, Bokaro, Chandigarj, Dehradun, Guwhati, Hyderabad, Indore, Jaipur, Kanpur, Karnal, Kolkata, Kota, Lucknow, Ludhiana, Mumbai, Noida, Patiala, Patna, Pune, Ranchi, Varanasi
Top Offers for goIITians
Correspondence Courses
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Classroom/Crash Courses
Aakash-IITJEE : AIEEE
Aakash-IITJEE : DCE
Aakash-IITJEE : MHTCET
Aakash Institute : AIPMT
Online Test Series
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Mahesh Tutorials
AMITY      Sri Chaitanya