IIT JEE , AIEEE Forum - Articles Category , Community shelf - GET ON TO LEARN SOMETHING DEAP IN ENTROPY

gorakavipraveen

FRIENDS, YOU CAN GET ON TO KNOW ABOUT ENTROPY. i HAVE FOUND THIS ON A SEARCH. ENJOY READING IT:

From coins to molecules: the spreading of energy

Disorder is more probable than order because there are so many more ways of achieving it. Thus coins and cards tend to assume random configurations when tossed or shuffled, and socks and books tend to become more scattered about a teenager?s room during the course of daily living. But there are some important differences between these large-scale mechanical, or macro systems, and the collections of sub-microscopic particles that constitute the stuff of chemistry.

In systems of chemical interest we are dealing with huge numbers of particles.
This is important because statistical predictions are always more accurate for larger samples. Thus although for four coin tosses there is a good chance (62%) that the H/T ratio will fall outside the range of 0.45 - 0.55, this probability becomes almost zero for 1000 tosses. To express this in a different way, the chances that 1000 gas molecules moving about randomly in a container would at any instant be distributed in a sufficiently non-uniform manner to produce a detectable pressure difference between any two halves of the space will be extremely small. If we increase the number of molecules to a chemically significant number (around 10²⁰, say), then the same probability becomes indistinguishable from zero.
Once the change begins, it proceeds spontaneously. That is, no external agent (a tosser, shuffler, or teen-ager) is needed to keep the process going. As long as the temperature is high enough for sufficiently energetic collisions to occur between the reacting molecules in a gas, the reaction will proceed to completion on its own once the reactants have been brought together.
Thermal energy is continually being exchanged between the particles of the system, and between the system and the surroundings. Collisions between molecules result in exchanges of momentum (and thus of kinetic energy) amongst the particles of the system, and (through collisions with the walls of a container, for example) with the surroundings.
Thermal energy spreads rapidly and randomly throughout the various energetically accessible microstates of the system. The degree to which the thermal energy is dispersed amongst these microstates is known as the entropy of the system.

The importance of these last two points is far greater than you might at first think, but to fully appreciate this, you must recall the various ways in which thermal energy is stored in molecules? hence the following brief review.

How thermal energy is stored in molecules

Thermal energy is kinetic energy, and thus relates to motion at the molecular scale. What kinds of molecular motions are possible? For monatomic molecules, there is only one: actual movement from one location to another, which we call translation. Since there are three directions in space, all molecules possess three modes of translational motion.

For polyatomic molecules, two additional kinds of motions are possible. One of these is rotation; a linear molecule such as CO₂ in which the atoms are all laid out along the x-axis can rotate along the y- and z-axes, while molecules having less symmetry can rotate about all three axes. Thus linear molecules possess two modes of rotational motion, while non-linear ones have three rotational modes.

Finally, molecules consisting of two or more atoms can undergo internal vibrations. For freely moving molecules in a gas, the number of vibrational modes or patterns depends on both the number of atoms and the shape of the molecule, and it increases rapidly as the molecule becomes more complicated.

The relative populations of the quantized translational, rotational and vibrational energy states of a typical diatomic molecule are depicted by the thickness of the lines in this schematic (not-to-scale!) diagram. The colored shading indicates the total thermal energy available at a given temperature. The numbers at the top show order-of-magnitude spacings between adjacent levels. It is readily apparent that virtually all the thermal energy resides in translational states.

Notice the greatly different spacing of the three kinds of energy levels. This is extremely important because it determines the number of energy quanta that a molecule can accept, and, as the following illustration shows, the number of different ways this energy can be distributed amongst the molecules.

The more closely spaced the quantized energy states of a molecule, the greater will be the number of ways in which a given quantity of thermal energy can be shared amongst a collection of these molecules.

The spacing of molecular energy states becomes closer as the mass and number of bonds in the molecule increases, so we can generally say that the more complex the molecule, the greater the density of its energy states.

Quantum states, microstates, and energy spreading

At the atomic and molecular level, all energy is quantized; each particle possesses discrete states of kinetic energy and is able to accept thermal energy only in packets whose values correspond to the energies of one or more of these states. Polyatomic molecules can store energy in rotational and vibrational motions, and all molecules (even monatomic ones) will possess tranlational kinetic energy (thermal energy) at all temperatures above absolute zero. The energy difference between adjacent translational states is so minute that translational kinetic energy can be regarded as continuous (non-quantized) for most practical purposes.

The number of ways in which thermal energy can be distributed amongst the allowed states within a collection of molecules is easily calculated from simple statistics, but we will confine ourselves to an example here. Suppose that we have a system consisting of three molecules and three quanta of energy to share among them. We can give all the kinetic energy to any one molecule, leaving the others with none, we can give two units to one molecule and one unit to another, or we can share out the energy equally and give one unit to each molecule. All told, there are ten possible ways of distributing three units of energy among three identical molecules as shown here:

Each of these ten possibilities represents a distinct microstate that will describe the system at any instant in time. Those microstates that possess identical distributions of energy among the accessible quantum levels (and differ only in which particular molecules occupy the levels) are known as configurations. Because all microstates are equally probable, the probability of any one configuration is proportional to the number of microstates that can produce it. Thus in the system shown above, the configuration labeled ii will be observed 60% of the time, while iii will occur only 10% of the time.

As the number of molecules and the number of quanta increases, the number of accessible microstates grows explosively; if 1000 quanta of energy are shared by 1000 molecules, the number of available microstates will be around 10⁶⁰⁰? a number that greatly exceeds the number of atoms in the observable universe! The number of possible configurations (as defined above) also increases, but in such a way as to greatly reduce the probability of all but the most probable configurations. Thus for a sample of a gas large enough to be observable under normal conditions, only a single configuration (energy distribution amongst the quantum states) need be considered; even the second-most-probable configuration can be neglected.

The bottom line: any collection of molecules large enough in numbers to have chemical significance will have its therrmal energy distributed over an unimaginably large number of microstates. The number of microstates increases exponentially as more energy states ("configurations" as defined above) become accessible owing to

Addition of energy quanta (higher temperature),
Increase in the number of molecules (resulting from dissociation, for example).
the volume of the system increases (which decreases the spacing between energy states, allowing more of them to be populated at a given temperature.)

Energy-spreading changes the world

Energy is conserved; if you lift a book off the table, and let it fall, the total amount of energy in the world remains unchanged. All you have done is transferred it from the form in which it was stored within the glucose in your body to your muscles, and then to the book (that is, you did work on the book by moving it up against the earth?s gravitational field.) After the book has fallen, this same quantity of energy exists as thermal energy (heat) in the book and table top.

What has changed, however, is the availability of this energy. Once the energy has spread into the huge number of thermal microstates in the warmed objects, the probabiliy of its spontaneously (that is, by chance) becoming un-dispersed is essentially zero. Thus although the energy is still ?there?, it is forever beyond utilization or recovery.

The profundity of this conclusion was recognized around 1900, when it was first described at the ?heat death? of the world. This refers to the fact that every spontaneous process (essentially every change that occurs) is accompanied by the ?dilution? of energy. The obvious implication is that all of the molecular-level kinetic energy will be spread out completely, and nothing more will ever happen. Not a happy thought!

Why do gases tend to expand but never contract?

Everybody knows that a gas, if left to itself, will tend to expand and fill the volume within which it is confined completely and uniformly. What ?drives? this expansion? At the simplest level it is clear that with more space available, random motions of the individual molecules will inevitably disperse them throughout the space. But as we mentioned above, the allowed energy states that molecules can occupy are spaced more closely in a larger volume than in a smaller one. The larger the volume available to the gas, the greater the number of microstates its thermal energy can occupy. Since all such states within the thermally accessible range of energies are equally probable, the expansion of the gas can be viewed as a consequence of the tendency of thermal energy to be spread and shared as widely as possible. Once this has happened, the probability that this sharing of energy will reverse itself (that is, that the gas will spontaneously contract) is so minute as to be unthinkable.

Expanson of a gas. This illustration represents the allowed thermal energy states of an ideal gas. The larger the volume in which the gas is enclosed, the more closely-spaced are these states, resulting in a huge increase in the number of microstates into which the available thermal energy can reside; this can be considered the origin of the thermodynamic "driving force" for the spontaneous expansion of a gas.

The same can in fact be said for even other highly probable distributions, such as having 49.999% of the molecules in the left half of the container and 50.001% in the right half. Even though the number of possible configurations that would yield this distribution of molecules is uncountably great, it is essentially negligible compared to the much larger number that would correspond to an exact 50-percent distribution.

Why heat flows from hot to cold

Just as gases spontaneously change their volumes from ?smaller-to-larger?, the flow of heat from a warmer body to a cooler one always operates in the direction ?warmer-to-cooler? because this allows thermal energy to populate a larger number of energy microstates as new ones are made available by bringing the cooler body into contact with the warmer one; in effect, the thermal energy becomes more ?diluted?.

Part a of the figure is a schematic depiction of the thermal energy states in two separated identical bodies at different temperatures (indicated by shading.)

When the bodies are brought into thermal contact (b), thermal energy flows from the higher occupied levels in the warmer object into the unoccupied levels of the cooler one until equal numbers are occupied in both bodies, bringing them to the same temperature.

As you might expect, the increase in the amount of energy spreading and sharing is proportional to amount of heat transferred q, but there is one other factor involved, and that is the temperature at which the transfer occurs. When a quantity of heat q passes into a system at temperature T, the degree of dilution of the thermal energy is given by

q /T

To understand why we have to divide by the temperature, consider the effect of very large and very small values of T in the denominator. If the body receiving the heat is initially at a very low temperature, relatively few thermal energy states are occupied, so the amount of energy spreading can be very great. Conversely, if the temperature is initially large, more thermal energy is already spread around within it, and absorption of the same amount of energy will have a relatively small effect on the degree of thermal disorder within the body.

Chemical reactions: why the equilibrium constant depends on the temperature

When a chemical reaction takes place, two kinds of changes relating to thermal energy are involved:

The ways that thermal energy can be stored within the reactants will generally be different from those for the products. For example, in the reaction H₂ 2 H, the reactant dihydrogen possesses vibrational and rotational energy states, while the atomic hydrogen in the product has translational states only? but the total number of translational states in two moles of H is twice as great as in one mole of H₂. Because of their extremely close spacing, translational states are the only ones that really count at ordinary temperatures, so we can say that thermal energy can become twice as diluted (?spread out?) in the product than in the reactant. If this were the only factor to consider, then dissociation of dihydrogen would always be spontaneous and this molecule would not exist.
In order for this dissociation to occur, however, a quantity of thermal energy (heat) q =?U must be taken up from the surroundings in order to break the H?H bond. In other words, the ground state (the energy at which the manifold of energy states begins) is higher in H, as indicated by the vertical displacement of the right half in each of the four panels below.

Shown below are schematic representations of the translational energy levels of the two components H and H₂ of the hydrogen dissociation reaction. The shading shows how the relative populations of occupied microstates vary with the temperature, causing the equilibrium composition to change in favor of the dissociation product.

The ability of energy to spread into the product molecules is constrained by the availability of sufficient thermal energy to produce the these molecules. This is where the temperature comes in. At absolute zero the situation is very simple; no thermal enegy is available to bring about dissociation, so the only component present will be dihydrogen.

As the temperature increases, the number of populated energy states rises, as indicated by the shading in the diagram. At temperature T₁, the number of populated states of H₂ is greater than that of 2H, so some of the latter will be present in the equilibrium mixture, but only as the minority component.
At some temperature T₂ the numbers of populated states in the two components of the reaction system will be identical, so the equilibrium mixture will contain H₂ and ?2H? in equal amounts; that is, the mole ratio of H₂/H will be 1:2.
As the temperature rises to T₃ and above, we see that the number of energy states that are thermally accessible in the product begins to exceed that for the reactant, thus favoring dissociation.

The result is exactly what the LeChâtelier Principle predicts: the equilibrium state for an endothermic reaction is shifted to the right at higher temperatures.

The following table generalizes these relations for the four sign-combinations of ?H° and ?S°, with example reactions.

	*C(graphite) + O₂(g) ? CO₂(g)* ?H° = ?393 kJ ?S° = +2.9 J K^?1?G° = ?394 kJ (at 298 K) This combustion reaction, like most such reactions, is spontaneous at all temperatures. The positive entropy change is due mainly to the greater mass of CO₂ compared to O₂.
	3 H₂ + N₂ ? 2 NH₃(g) ?H° = ?46.2 kJ ?S° = ?389 J K^?1 ?G° = ?16.4 kJ The decrease in moles of gas in the Haber ammonia synthesis drives the entropy change negative. Thus higher T, which speeds up the reaction, also reduces its extent.
	N₂O₄(g) ? 2 NO₂(g) ?H° = +62 kJ ?S° = +176 J K^?1 ?G° = ?48 kJ Dissociation reactions are typically endothermic with positive entropy change. Ultimately, all molecules decompose to their atoms at sufficiently high temperatures
	½ N₂ + O₂ ? NO₂(g) ?H° = 33.2 kJ ?S° = ?249 J K^?1 ?G° = +51.3 kJ Although NO₂ is thermodynamically unstable, the reverse of this reaction is kinetically hindered, so this oxide can exist indefinitely at ordinary temperatures.

Phase changes

Everybody knows that the solid is the stable form of a substance at low temperatures, while the gaseous state prevails at high temperatures. Why should this be? The diagram at the right shows that (1) the density of energy states is smallest in the solid and greatest (much, much greater) in the gas, and (2) the ground states of the liquid and gas are offset from that of the previous state by the heats of fusion and vaporization, respectively.

Changes of phase involve exchange of energy with the surroundings (whose energy content relative to the system is indicated (with much exaggeration!) by the height of the yellow vertical bars below. When solid and liquid are in equilibrium (middle section of diagram below), there is sufficient thermal energy (indicated by pink shading) to populate the energy states of both phases. If heat is allowed to flow into the surroundings, it is withdrawn selectively from the more abundantly populated levels of the liquid phase, causing the quantity of this phase to decrease in favor of the solid. The temperature remains constant as the heat of fusion is returned to the system in exact compensation for the heat lost to the surroundings. Finally, after the last trace of liquid has disappeared, the only states remaining are those of the solid. Any further withdrawal of heat results in a temperature drop as the states of the solid become depopulated.

Entropy of mixing and dilution

All substances, given the opportunity to form a homogeneous mixture with other substances, will tend to become more dilute. This can be rationalized simply from elementary statistics; there are more equally probable ways of arranging one hundred black marbles and one hundred white marbles, than two hundred marbles of a single color. For massive objects like marbles this has nothing to do with entropy, of course. But when we are dealing with huge numbers of molecules capable of storing, exchanging and spreading thermal energy, mixing and expansion are definitely entropy-driven processes. It can be argued, in fact, that mixing and expansion are really very similar; after all, when we mix two gases, each is expanding into the space formerly occupied exclusively by the other.

Entropy and free energy of mixing

The boxes shown below consist of two sections having identical volumes and separated by a removable barrier. Two ideal gases are dipicted by dots of different colors. When the barrier is removed, the two gases spontaneously mix, as shown in the bottom two diagrams.

For the single gas (a and b) the entropy of the system increases by ?S = ln 2 and ?G = ?ln 2. Recalling Dalton's law that "each gas is a vacuum to the other gas", the mixing process that occurs when the barrier in (c) is removed simply multiplies these two quantities by two.

In terms of the spreading of thermal energy the situation is particularly dramatic; the addition of even a single molecule of B to a gas A results in a huge increase in the number of energically-identical (degenerate) microstates that correspond to the interchange of every molecule in the gas with the new molecule. When actual molar quantities of two gases mix, the number of new microstates created is beyond comprehension.

The tendency of a gas to expand is due to the more closely-spaced thermal energy states in the larger volume (b). When one molecule of a different kind is introduced into the gas (c), each microstate in (b) splits into a huge number of energetically-identical new states, denoted (inadequately) by the dashed lines in (c).

Colligative properties of solutions

Vapor pressure lowering, boiling point elevation, freezing point depression and osmosis are well-known phenomena that occur when a non-volatile solute such as sugar or a salt is dissolved in a volatile solvent such as water. All these effects result from ?dilution? of the solvent by the added solute, and because of this commonality they are referred to as colligative properties (Lat. co ligare, connected to.) The key role of the solvent concentration is obscured by the greatly-simplified expressions used to calculate the magnitude of these effects, in which only the solute concentration appears. The details of how to carry out these calculations and the many important applications of colligative properties are covered elsewhere. Our purpose here is to offer a more complete explanation of why these phenomena occur.

Basically, these all result from the effect of dilution of the solvent on its entropy, and thus in the increase in the density of energy states of the system in the solution compared to that in the pure liquid. Equilibrium between two phases (liquid-gas for boiling and solid-liquid for freezing) occurs when the energy states in each phase can be populated at equal densities. The temperatures at which this occurs are depicted by the shading.

Effects of pressure on the entropy

When a liquid is subjected to hydrostatic pressure? for example, by an inert, non-dissolving gas that occupies the vapor space above the surface, the vapor pressure of the liquid is raised. The pressure acts to compress the liquid very slightly, effectively narrowing the potential energy well in which the individual molecules reside and thus increasing their tendency to escape from the liquid phase. (Because liquids are not very compressible, the effect is quite small; a 100-atm applied pressure will raise the vapor pressure of water at 25°C by only about 2 torr.) In terms of the entropy, we can say that the applied pressure reduces the dimensions of the "box" within which the principal translational motions of the molecules are confined within the liquid, thus reducing the density of energy states in the liquid phase.

This phenomenon can explain osmotic pressure. Osmotic pressure, students must be reminded, is not what drives osmosis, but is rather the hydrostatic pressure that must be applied to the more concentrated solution (more dilute solvent) in order to stop osmotic flow of solvent into the solution. The effect of this pressure ? is to slightly increase the spacing of solvent energy states on the high-pressure (dilute-solvent) side of the membrane to match that of the pure solvent, restoring osmotic equilibrium.

Ask & Discuss Questions with Community & Experts