|
|
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jan 2007 20:17:24 IST
|
|
|
Agreed with sir cvrmana. Ofcourse speed of light in all the frames whether moving or at rest is c = 300, 000, 000 m/s
I would like to elaborate on the point that photons does not have infinit mass its mass is
m = hf/c^2, where f is frequency of the light of which photon is a quanta.
Momentum is also possessed by photons and momentum of photon is given by P = hf/c
Anything that has momentum ofcourse possess mass and due to momentum only photons exert radiation pressure on the surface on which it falls.
Now coming to ROHITJU's query
anything moving with velocity of light has infinite mass PROVIDED the rest mass of the body is not zero. Thus the concept is not applicable for photons as its rest mass (though photons can never be at rest, remember this and please don't be confused) is zero.
m = m0 / [(1 - v^2/c^2)^2]
where mo is rest mass
and m = mass when body is moving with velocity 'v'
and if mo is NON ZERO then
for v = c or v is comparable to c (limiting case)
m = INFINITE
But the concept fails to explain when applied for photons as
for photons v=c, mo = 0
so m = 0/0 is not defined
Thus we use the concept E = mc^2 = hf
or m = hf/c^2, thus is the mass of photon.
I hope the things are now crystal clear.
|
The Scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, & he delights in it because it is beautiful. If nature were not beautiful, it would not be worth knowing, life would not be worth living. Ofcourse I do not here speak of that beauty that strikes the senses, the beauty of qualities & appearances; not that I undervalue such beauty, far from it, but it has nothing to do with science; I mean that profounder beauty which comes from the harmoniuos order of the parts, & which a pure intelligence can grasp. |
this reply: 10 points
(with 2 
in 2 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|