|
|
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 22 Nov 2006 14:56:18 IST
|
|
|
I think you know the binomial theorem I would start with trinomials. You should expand (a + b + c)2 and (a + b + c)3 by multiplying them out to see how the coefficients are constructed. (a + b + c)2 =(a + b + c)(a + b + c) = a2 + b2 + c2 + 2ab + 2ac + 2bc
(a + b + c)3 = (a + b + c)(a + b + c)(a + b + c) = a3 + b3 + c3 + 3a2b + 3a2c + 3ab2 + 3b2c + 3 ac2 + 3 bc2 + 6 abc If you think of these two examples as (a + b + c)n then each of the term is a constant times apbqcr where p + q + r = n. In the first case n = 2 and in the second n = 3. In the general case
The notation means that you form a sum of all possible terms of the form apbqcr where p + q + r = n with each term having a coefficient of The multinomial theorem is of the same form. Multinomial Theorem Proof (Alternate) A multinomial is a mathematical expression consisting of two or more terms, e.g. The multinomial theorem provides the general form of the expansion of the powers of this expression, in the process specifying the multinomial coefficients which are found in that expansion. The expansion is:  | (1) | The expression  occurring in the expansion is called multinomial coefficient and is denoted by First, for  , both sides equal  . For the induction step, suppose the multinomial theorem holds for  . Then the binomial theorem and the induction assumption yield where and is a multi-index in . To complete the proof, we need to show that the sets are equal. The inclusion is clear since For , suppose , and . Let . Then , so for some . It follows that that . Let us define  and let  be a multi-index in  . Then This completes the proof.
|
this reply: 10 points
(with 2 
in 2 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|