Ask iit jee aieee pet cbse icse state board community Discussion Response Post to: prove tolmey's theorem
Forum Index -> Analytical Geometry -> View Full Question Email  
Author Message
abhilash (161)

Cool goIITian


abhilash's Avatar

total posts: 69    
Offline

Ptolemy's Relation

can be reformulated as

valid for the cross-ratio 

of any four (pairwise different) complex numbers z_1,\ldots,z_4.

To make this connection explicit one represents the four vertices P_1, \ldots, P_4  as four complex numbers z_1, \ldots, z_4 of norm one, arranged in (counterclockwise) cyclic order on the unit circle. For two complex numbers x,y on the unit circle their squared distance equals

Therefore for any quadruple of (pairwise different) complex numbers (z1,z2,z3,z4) on the unit circle the square of the "length

cross-ratio"

 is equal to the square \,\mbox{cr}^2(z_1,z_2,z_3,z_4) of the ordinary ("complex points" ) cross-ratio 

. Taking square roots one first deduces

for any quadruple \,(z_1,\ldots,z_4) of points on the unit circle. The sign factor \epsilon \in \{ -1,1\} depends on the relative position of the four points \,z_1, \ldots, z_4 on the unit circle and can be determined using the invariance of the cross-ratio under a linear fractional transformation  z \mapsto {{az+b}\over{cz+d}}. Assume that the quadruple \,(z_1, \ldots,z_4) on the unit circle is arranged in natural (counterclockwise) cyclic order. Then

\,\mbox{cr}(z_1,z_2,z_3,z_4)>1.

This property can be proved using the projective transformation r:\; z \mapsto i{{(1+z)}\over{(1-z)}} (which is the "inverse Cayley transform  "). It maps the punctured unit circle S^{1}\setminus \{z=1\} (continuously) to the real line \mathbb{R} (with the upper (resp. lower) arc of the unit circle mapping to the negative (resp. positive) half-line). In polar coordinates the map is given as \,r(e^{ i \alpha})=-\cot( \alpha /2) which shows that it defines a monotone function in the "angle" coordinate  \alpha \in )0,2\pi(. Therefore the sign of the cross-ratio can be read off from the mutual order of the image points on the real line. After multiplying the zi with a suitable scalar z' of norm 1 one may in addition assume that z_i \ne 1 for all i. If the quadruple (\,z_1, \ldots,z_4)on the unit circle (punctured at z = 1) is arranged in natural (counterclockwise) cyclic order the image quadruple \,(y_1, \ldots, y_4):=(\,r(z_1),r(z_2),r(z_3),r(z_4)\,) satisfies \, y_1 <y_2 <y_3<y_4 . The relation

then shows that \,\mbox{cr}(z_1,z_2,z_3,z_4)=\mbox{cr}(y_1,y_2,y_3,y_4)>1. On the other hand, if one interchanges the middle pair (z2,z3) in a cyclically ordered quadruple then the cross-ratio will become negative because \,\mbox{cr}(z_1,z_3,z_2,z_4)=1-\mbox{cr}(z_1,z_2,z_3,z_4)<0, using the relation of cross-ratio's

Summarizing the sign discussion one obtains that for a quadruple (z_1, \ldots, z_4) of (pairwise different) points on the unit circle given in (counterclockwise) cyclic order one has

and

Ptolemy's relation

can now be interpreted as the algebraic relation (already used above) between cross-ratios

using the representation of the vertices P_1,\ldots,P_4 as the points z_1, \ldots, z_4 on the unit circle.

 

0 people liked this
 
Free Sign Up!

Preparing for IIT-JEE ?

Arihant Revision Package for IIT JEE - Books, Practice Tests + Rank Predictor


@ INR 1,995/-

For Quick Info

Name

Mobile No.

Sponsored Ads