of any four (pairwise different) complex numbers
.
To make this connection explicit one represents the four vertices
as four complex numbers
of norm one, arranged in (counterclockwise) cyclic order on the unit circle. For two complex numbers x,y on the unit circle their squared distance equals

Therefore for any quadruple of (pairwise different) complex numbers (z1,z2,z3,z4) on the unit circle the square of the "length
cross-ratio"
is equal to the square
of the ordinary ("complex points" ) cross-ratio
. Taking square roots one first deduces

for any quadruple
of points on the unit circle. The sign factor
depends on the relative position of the four points
on the unit circle and can be determined using the invariance of the cross-ratio under a linear fractional transformation
. Assume that the quadruple
on the unit circle is arranged in natural (counterclockwise) cyclic order. Then

This property can be proved using the projective transformation
(which is the "inverse Cayley transform "). It maps the punctured unit circle
(continuously) to the real line
(with the upper (resp. lower) arc of the unit circle mapping to the negative (resp. positive) half-line). In polar coordinates the map is given as
which shows that it defines a monotone function in the "angle" coordinate
. Therefore the sign of the cross-ratio can be read off from the mutual order of the image points on the real line. After multiplying the zi with a suitable scalar z' of norm 1 one may in addition assume that
for all i. If the quadruple
on the unit circle (punctured at z = 1) is arranged in natural (counterclockwise) cyclic order the image quadruple
satisfies
. The relation

then shows that
. On the other hand, if one interchanges the middle pair (z2,z3) in a cyclically ordered quadruple then the cross-ratio will become negative because
, using the relation of cross-ratio's

Summarizing the sign discussion one obtains that for a quadruple
of (pairwise different) points on the unit circle given in (counterclockwise) cyclic order one has

and

Ptolemy's relation

can now be interpreted as the algebraic relation (already used above) between cross-ratios

using the representation of the vertices
as the points
on the unit circle.